Baroque neutrinos and Zee-Babu model

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mitchell porter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model Neutrinos
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of the 4.8σ anomaly in MiniBooNE data, which cannot be reconciled with MINOS+ and IceCube data under the standard neutrino oscillation framework involving an eV-mass sterile neutrino. The authors propose that nonstandard neutrino interactions in a 3+1 neutrino scheme could provide a consistent explanation. They reference the Zee-Babu model, which introduces two new scalars to generate neutrino mass, but highlight significant challenges, including strong disfavor from astronomical data regarding a 1 eV right-handed neutrino and inconsistencies in MiniBooNE analysis. The conversation emphasizes the need for caution in interpreting these anomalies and the potential for model revision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of neutrino oscillation theory
  • Familiarity with the 3+1 neutrino scheme
  • Knowledge of nonstandard neutrino interactions
  • Basic concepts of the Zee-Babu model
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Zee-Babu model on neutrino mass generation
  • Study the MiniBooNE experiment and its analysis techniques
  • Explore the role of nonstandard interactions in particle physics
  • Investigate alternative models to the 3+1 neutrino scheme
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in neutrino studies, and anyone interested in advanced theoretical models of neutrino interactions and mass generation.

mitchell porter
Gold Member
Messages
1,523
Reaction score
815
https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01000
MiniBooNE, MINOS+ and IceCube data imply a baroque neutrino sector
Jiajun Liao, Danny Marfatia, Kerry Whisnant
(Submitted on 1 Oct 2018)
The 4.8σ anomaly in MiniBooNE data cannot be reconciled with MINOS+ and IceCube data within the vanilla framework of neutrino oscillations involving an eV-mass sterile neutrino. We show that a consistent picture can be drawn if charged-current and neutral-current nonstandard neutrino interactions are at work in the 3+1 neutrino scheme. It appears that either the neutrino sector is more elaborate than usually envisioned, or one or more datasets needs revision.

This paper discusses the hypothetical new interactions only at the effective level (eqns 1 & 2) and doesn't say anything about what the underlying physics might be. However, via their ref 13, I have become aware of the "Zee-Babu model", which produces neutrino mass, not with right-handed neutrinos, but with two new scalars, of charge +1 and +2. Apparently this also contains the two kinds of nonstandard interaction required.

But since this paper is about extending the "3+1 neutrino scheme", it seems that we would be talking about three left-handed neutrinos, three right-handed neutrinos, a 1 eV sterile neutrino, and the two Zee-Babu scalars. Well, they did call it baroque...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are lots of reasons to disfavor this model.

For example, the astronomy data strongly disfavors the existence of a 1 eV right handed neutrino that oscillates with ordinary neutrinos (at more than 5 sigma).

The MiniBoone analysis resonance shape isn't right for a new neutrino. And, the MiniBoone analysis doesn't correct for shifting proportions of reactor fuel which have been shown to materially affect background expectations from the SM three massive neutrino model.

Other neutrino oscillation studies using reactors also don't see the 3+1 in their data and indeed rule it out.

There is also no evidence whatsoever for lepton number violation that would be expected in a Majorana neutrino model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K