1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Base and index steps

  1. Mar 13, 2004 #1
    im sick of logs

    use base and index steps to show the answer to 37 x 0.785 using logarithms with a base of 10, e and 5.

    i just want to know how to start this problem.

    thanks in advance
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 13, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I'm really not sure what "base" and "index" steps are.

    And I must admit that I'm surprised to see anyone using logarithms to actually do multiplications in this era! It's an interesting historical fact, but I consider the use of logarithms as the "inverse" of exponentials to be a much more important use.

    I suspect what you are looking at is:

    The log(37 x 0.785)= log(37)+ log(0.785) in any base. If you were doing this in base 10 and looking the values up in a table (why would anyone do that anymore), you would find that the table only contains logarithms of numbers from 1 to 10 and so does not contain either
    37 or 0.785. What you would do is write 37 as 3.7* 10 and then look up the logarithm of 3.7 (it's 0.5682 to 4 decimal place- I used a calculator, not a table!) and note that the log of 10 is 1 simply because 10= 101 so that the log of 37 is 1.5682. Now write 0.785 as 7.85*10-1. Look up the log of 7.85 (it's 0.8949-guess how I got that!) and of course, the log of 10-1 is -1. In the "olden days" we would simply write that as
    0.8949-1. Now, we know that log(37*0.785)= 1.5682+ 0.8949- 1= 1.4631 (yes, I used a calculator to do that sum!). Now "looking up" the anti-logarithm of that (once upon a time you just used your table of logarithms in reverse), the anti-log of 0.4631 is 2.904. Since the anitlogarithm of 1 is 10, the result is 2.904*10= 29.04 (remarkably enough, that's what my calculator gives as the product of 37 and 0.785!).

    As far as base e and base 5 are concerned, I used to have a book of math tables that had natural logarithms but I don't recall ever using them! I doubt that any one has ever made a table of logarithms base 5. Yes, you could use your calculator to determine the logarithms but why would you rather than just doing the multiplication on a calculator.

    Well, if you insist, ln(37)= 3.6109 (that makes sense- e is about 2.7 and 33= 27) and ln(0.785)= -.2421 (negative because 0.785 is less than one. Remember that "-1" on the common logarithm?).
    The sum of those is 3.6109- .2421= 3.3688 and the "anti-logarithm" (e to that power) is 29.04 again. I still not sure what the "base" and "index" steps are unless the "base" part is taking the logarithm and the "index" part is the anti-logarithm.

    As for base 5, my calculator (and I suspect yours) does not have a "logarithm base 5" key but I'm sure you know that the log base 5 of 37 is log(37)/log(5) where it does not matter which log you use:
    log(37)/log(5)= 2.2436 (again, that makes sense. 52= 25 and 37 is a bit larger than that) and log, base 5, of 0.785 is
    log(0.785)/log(5)= -0.1504. That tells us that log, base 5, of 37*0.785 is 2.2436- 0.1504= 2.0931. And, of course, 37*0.785= 52.0931= 29.04 again.

    I can't tell you how silly I feel using a calculator to determine the logarithms and do the addition when it would be much easier to use the calculator to do the multiplication itself!
  4. Mar 13, 2004 #3
    oh my god thanks a lot Ivy. the help was so much appreciated!

    what can i say our teacher is a bit backwards in teaching methods. we basically have to figure out log numbers without calculators and slide rules!

    once again thanks
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Base and index steps
  1. Index of Refraction (Replies: 1)

  2. Refractive index (Replies: 5)

  3. Refractive Indexes (Replies: 11)

  4. Index of refraction (Replies: 5)

  5. Refractive Index (Replies: 5)