1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Basic Kinematics Question

  1. Jan 9, 2014 #1
    Say you have a v-t diagram for the motion of a particle in one dimension where the velocity is positive at first and then negative later. If you integrate and get zero, why doesn't that mean that the particle started moving and then came back to the origin?
    Last edited: Jan 9, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 9, 2014 #2

    Andrew Mason

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Are we to assume that all motion is in one dimension?

    If the particle is moving backwards the velocity will be negative so the change in displacement during that period, ∫vdt, will be negative.

    Displacement is the distance from the origin with its direction from the origin (ie. + or - x). The change in displacement is defined as the final displacement (position) minus the initial displacement .

  4. Jan 9, 2014 #3
    Yes, assuming that the motion is in one dimension, does an integral of zero of a v-t curve indicate that the particle has traveled back to the origin or hasn't moved at all?
  5. Jan 9, 2014 #4


    Staff: Mentor

    It has traveled back to its starting point, which may or may not be the origin.
  6. Jan 10, 2014 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Has anyone actually suggested it doesn't?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Basic Kinematics Question Date
Basic motion question involoving kinematics Oct 31, 2012
Quick basic kinematics theory Oct 29, 2011
Basic kinematic physics equations do not make sense to me. Feb 21, 2010
Basic kinematics Nov 10, 2005
Basic kinematics Nov 10, 2005