Basic Math Challenge - May 2018

In summary: That the volume is confined to the first octant. This eliminates the negative coordinates. The condition x + y + z ≤ √2 means that the volume is confined to a tetrahedron with vertices at the origin and the points (1,0,0), (0,1,0), and (0,0,1). The condition x^2 + y^2 ≤ 1 means that the volume is further confined to a cylinder with radius 1 and height 1, bounded by the plane z = 1. To find the volume, we integrate over the given region using the cylindrical coordinate system. The limits of integration for r are 0 to 1, for θ are 0 to π/
  • #71
... and the ##\mathbb{F}_8-##basis over ##\mathbb{F}_2## with its multiplication rules.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
StoneTemplePython said:
Problem 6 is still open.
I find #6 ambiguous. If an urn has 3 whites and 1 black what do you think is the probability of drawing 3 that are either all white or all black?
 
  • #73
StoneTemplePython said:
Problem 6 is still open.

I'd be much obliged if someone tackles it
The only way I can make a reasonable problem from the way it was posed is as follows:
The probability of getting all white or all black from urn 2 is prob all white + prob all black.
In that case it is impossible due to Fermat's Theorem and n ≥ 3.

That's what Fermat told me.
 
  • Like
Likes StoneTemplePython
  • #74
Zafa Pi said:
The only way I can make a reasonable problem from the way it was posed is as follows:
The probability of getting all white or all black from urn 2 is prob all white + prob all black.
In that case it is impossible due to Fermat's Theorem and n ≥ 3.

That's what Fermat told me.

Can you expand on this a bit for others' benefit?

It's a mildly famous problem designed by E. C. Molina, to cast Fermat's Last Theorem as a probability problem.
 
Last edited:
  • #75
There are some trivial solutions for (6).
Zafa Pi said:
If an urn has 3 whites and 1 black what do you think is the probability of drawing 3 that are either all white or all black?
1/43 + (3/4)3. We draw with replacement.
Zafa Pi said:
In that case it is impossible due to Fermat's Theorem and n ≥ 3.
Huh?
 
  • #76
mfb said:
Huh?
Let N be the number of balls in each urn, W the number of white balls in urn 1, b and w the number of black and white balls in urn 2, n > 2 the number drawn from each urn. With my interpretation in #73 of the problem we get:
(W/b+w)n = (b/b+w)n + (w/b+w)n.
Multiplying by (b+w)n we have Wn = bn + wn which is impossible for n > 2 by Fermat's (Wiles') Theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes StoneTemplePython
  • #77
Ah. I interpreted "the probability that all white balls are drawn from the first urn" as probability that every white ball in the urn is drawn at least once.
 
  • #78
mfb said:
Ah. I interpreted "the probability that all white balls are drawn from the first urn" as probability that every white ball in the urn is drawn at least once.
I think that the way the problem was formulated is problematic. I attempted to point that out to @StoneTemplePython in post #72, but received no response.
For example, If an urn contains 3 whites and one black, then what is the probability of drawing (with replacement) three balls such that they are either all white or all black? I think the only reasonable answer is ¾3, which = the probability of drawing three white balls. Thus urn 1 and urn 2 are the same is a solution.

Perhaps it should be said that the urns contain at least 3 (or n) of each color.
 
  • #79
Zafa Pi said:
I think that the way the problem was formulated is problematic. I attempted to point that out to @StoneTemplePython in post #72, but received no response.
For example, If an urn contains 3 whites and one black, then what is the probability of drawing (with replacement) three balls such that they are either all white or all black? I think the only reasonable answer is ¾3, which = the probability of drawing three white balls. Thus urn 1 and urn 2 are the same is a solution.

Perhaps it should be said that the urns contain at least 3 (or n) of each color.

This problem and its wording, setting aside one or two nits, is verbatim from Mosteller's Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability. It is the last problem in the book, of course numbered 50 56. (There are some bonus problems.)

People are free to ask questions to clarify, though posts #72 and #73, ##\lt 3 \text{ hours }## apart, both arrived while I was offline.

- - -
My read: Post #72 did not directly seek to clarify the wording of the question but instead said "what do you think...".

On the other hand, Post #73 was direct and had the answer. I responded to the most recent, accurate and direct post, #73.

- - -
n.b.

I also liked this:

Zafa Pi said:
That's what Fermat told me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
  • #80
Post 73 doesn't address the interpretation question for urn 1. As you marked it as solved I guess the different wording for urn 1 doesn't mean anything. "It is impossible" is a strange solution to "Find the number of [...]".

With the other interpretation I could rule out 1 and 2 white balls in urn 1 for 3 and 4 drawings, but the problem gets much more difficult.
 
  • #82
First day open to all. Open: 1.b.) ##\mathbb{F}_2-## basis of ##\mathbb{F}_8## and its multiplication resp. addition structure.
 
  • #83
Solution to 1.b)
QuantumQuest said:
From there determine a basis of ##\mathbb{F}_8## over ##\mathbb{F}_2## and write down its multiplication and addition laws.
This is actually the easiest part of all. Let's say we have the minimal polynomial ##x^3+x+1=0\,##, and we assume a root ##\xi \,##, i.e. an element which satisfies ##\xi^3+\xi +1 =0##. Then
$$
x^3+x+1 = (x+\xi)(x+\xi^2)(x+\xi+\xi^2)
$$
and ##\{1,\xi,\xi^2\}## is a ##\mathbb{F}_2## basis of ##\mathbb{F}_8##. The elements are thus
$$
\{0,1,\xi,\xi+1 = \xi^3,\xi^2,\xi^2+1=\xi^6,\xi^2+\xi=\xi^4,\xi^2+\xi+1=\xi^5\}
$$
which defines the multiplicative group generated by ##\xi## as well as the addition table.
 

Similar threads

  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
80
Views
4K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
93
Views
10K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
4
Replies
114
Views
6K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
Back
Top