1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Basic measure theory

  1. Feb 21, 2010 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Show that if [itex]E \subset B[/itex] and [itex]B \in L(\mathbb{R})[/itex] (where L(R) denotes the family of Lebesgue measurable sets on the reals) with [itex]m(B) < \inf [/itex], then [itex]E \in L(\mathbb{R})[/itex] if and only if [itex]m(B) = m^{*}(E) + m^{*}(B - E)[/itex], where [itex]m^*[/itex] denotes the Lebesgue outer measure.


    2. Relevant equations
    Basic set theoretic manipulations.


    3. The attempt at a solution
    The forward direction follows by the definition of the outer measure. As for the reverse direction, we need to show that for any set A contained in the reals,
    [tex]m(A) \geq m^{*}(A \cap E) + m^{*}(A - E)[/tex]
    (the less than or equal direction follows from subaddivity).
    I'm not really stuck at this point, but I'm wondering about my approach from here. I simply considered the three cases where A contains B, A is contained in B and contains E, and A is contained in E. I'm fairly certain this works out in each case as it should. This seems like a pretty straightforward approach, but is there a better way? I understand this isn't exactly the most interesting of problems but it helps me to know what other tools are available to me at this point. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?



Similar Discussions: Basic measure theory
  1. Outer Measures (Replies: 0)

  2. Complete measure space (Replies: 0)

  3. Product measures (Replies: 0)

Loading...