- #1

- 83

- 0

I'm also curious about the expression u=f(x, y, z). What is that exactly? How is it related to the x, y, z coordinates?

- Thread starter The_ArtofScience
- Start date

- #1

- 83

- 0

I'm also curious about the expression u=f(x, y, z). What is that exactly? How is it related to the x, y, z coordinates?

- #2

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 956

Since you haven't said what you mean by "f" or "y", it's hard to be precise. IF you have some function f(x) (or g(t), h(u), etc.) that you want to graph on an xy-coordinate system, since it is standard to use the x-axis to represent the independent variable (x or t or u or whatever) and the y-axis to represent the dependent variable (f(x) or g(t) or h(u) or whatever), yes it is standard to y= f(x) or y(x) in place of f(x). If f(0)= 1 and you have assigned x to the independent variable and y to the dependent variable, perhaps for graphing purposes, then you would have y(0)= 1. On a graph, that would be a point exactly one unit above the origin on the y-axis.

u= f(x,y,z) is a function that assigns a value to each possible combination of three independent values. Although, like all of mathematics, it can be used in many different ways, it is a common application to think of x, y, z as coordinates that designate points in space. One specific application would be to think of u as air temperature. A coordinate system would assign three numbers to each point in space. u(x,y,z) would be the temperature at each point.

u= f(x,y,z) is a function that assigns a value to each possible combination of three independent values. Although, like all of mathematics, it can be used in many different ways, it is a common application to think of x, y, z as coordinates that designate points in space. One specific application would be to think of u as air temperature. A coordinate system would assign three numbers to each point in space. u(x,y,z) would be the temperature at each point.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #3

- 83

- 0

I'm still curious though, if f(x,y) represents z, then what would f(x,y,z) be? Its hard to imagine another coordinate in the xyz coordinate plane, and if there is another coordinate, I might be overlooking it.

- #4

CompuChip

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 4,302

- 47

f(x, y, z) is a function that gives a value for each point in space, rather than each point in a plane. The example that HallsOfIvy gave, is the function that assigns to every point in the room the air temperature at that point.

The problem with functions of three and more variables is that we cannot draw them because we don't have enough dimensions. A function f(x) of one variable, can be drawn in two dimensions (set up an*x*-axis, and for each point *x* draw the corresponding value f(x) directly above it on the *y*-axis). Functions of two variables can still be drawn: above each point in the plane, draw the function value on the *z*-axis, like https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/96/968788-0.png [Broken]. But to draw a function of three variables, you would have to have four perpendicular axes. Unfortunately we only live in a three-dimensional space, so it's very hard imagining this (and impossible doing it intuitively, let along projecting it on a two-dimensional piece of paper). Best thing you can do is try to think of the temperature analogy. You can then extend this also to a function of four variables, f(x, y, z, t) which would give the air temperature in the room at a given point (x, y, z) and a time *t*.

Another way to look at it: consider a function like a slot machine. It has some number of input slots, which we label by arbitrary letters (x, y, z, ...) -- if you put numerical values on these slots the function machine spits out a value. For example, the function [itex]f(x) = x^2[/itex] has one input slot*x*: if I insert *x = 3* it spits out 9 and if I put in *x = 1/2* it spits out 1/4. The advantage of a function of one (two) variables is that it can be graphed, by putting all possible input values on the x axis (x and y axes) and the corresponding output on the y (z) axis, which gives you an insight in *how* the number is produced (e.g. if I slightly increase *x*, what will happen to f(x)), an advantage you don't have in more dimensions (though, in more advanced mathematics there are ways to describe the behavior of arbitrary functions which are almost as good as drawing graphs).

The problem with functions of three and more variables is that we cannot draw them because we don't have enough dimensions. A function f(x) of one variable, can be drawn in two dimensions (set up an

Another way to look at it: consider a function like a slot machine. It has some number of input slots, which we label by arbitrary letters (x, y, z, ...) -- if you put numerical values on these slots the function machine spits out a value. For example, the function [itex]f(x) = x^2[/itex] has one input slot

Last edited by a moderator:

- #5

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 956

I

I'm still curious though, if f(x,y) represents z, then what would f(x,y,z) be? Its hard to imagine another coordinate in the xyz coordinate plane, and if there is another coordinate, I might be overlooking it.

Of course, you

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 717

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K