Time Travel: What are the Theories & Factors?

In summary, the possible factors that allow for time travel include the speed of light, the rotation of the Earth, and a person's concept of time.
  • #71
rede96 said:
Does anyone know the best way for me to study SR, taking into account that I am a bit behind with the math?

Some good books about special relativity are (from easiest to hardest):

Takeuchi, An Illustrated Guide to Relativity
Mermin, It's About Time: Understanding Einstein's Relativity
Taylor and Wheeler, Spacetime Physics

The advantage of Takeuchi and Mermin is that they require very little background in math or physics. Their disadvantage is a total lack of connection to experiment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
does this mean that our heart rate would slow down...and all our body functions also slow down...if we were traveling at 90% of c so that our age doesn't increase compared to the person on the earth?
 
  • #73
hanii said:
does this mean that our heart rate would slow down...and all our body functions also slow down...if we were traveling at 90% of c so that our age doesn't increase compared to the person on the earth?

No, not exactly. For you, wherever you are, (Called your Frame of Reference, or FoR as you might have seen posted by people.) you age at the same rate. It is only when you move relative to someone else that they will see you age slower.

The strange thing about Relativity is that you will also see them age slower too.
 
  • #74
bcrowell said:
Some good books about special relativity are (from easiest to hardest):

Takeuchi, An Illustrated Guide to Relativity
Mermin, It's About Time: Understanding Einstein's Relativity
Taylor and Wheeler, Spacetime Physics

The advantage of Takeuchi and Mermin is that they require very little background in math or physics. Their disadvantage is a total lack of connection to experiment.

Brilliant, thanks.
 
  • #75
bcrowell said:
Is the Al-Khalili book good?
Yes, in my opinion this one sticks out above the other popular books on the subject.
 
  • #76
hanii said:
does this mean that our heart rate would slow down...and all our body functions also slow down...if we were traveling at 90% of c so that our age doesn't increase compared to the person on the earth?

As rede96 intimates, yes and no.

Your heart rate and metabolism will be observed to be at a different rate than that of an observer moving relative to you. You experience nothing untoward.

But note: the time dilation is quite real; it is not an illusion. Time really is marching by at a different rate for the two of you.
 
  • #77
Hong Kong scientists 'show time travel is impossible'


http://news.yahoo.com/hong-kong-scientists-show-time-travel-impossible-150026913.html [Broken]


Looks like the odds that any form of time travel exists are now extremely short.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #78
Tanelorn said:
Hong Kong scientists 'show time travel is impossible'


http://news.yahoo.com/hong-kong-scientists-show-time-travel-impossible-150026913.html [Broken]


Looks like the odds that any form of time travel exists are now extremely short.

What does the speed of a photon have to do with the possibility of time travel?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #79
phinds said:
What does the speed of a photon have to do with the possibility of time travel?
Read here:
"The possibility of time travel was raised 10 years ago when scientists discovered superluminal -- or faster-than-light -- propagation of optical pulses in some specific medium, the team said.

It was later found to be a visual effect, but researchers thought it might still be possible for a single photon to exceed light speed."

It is a specific circumstance where it looked like time travel might be possible. That specific circumstance has been ruled out. It says nothing about any other possible solution to time travel.
 
  • #80
DaveC426913 said:
Read here:
"The possibility of time travel was raised 10 years ago when scientists discovered superluminal -- or faster-than-light -- propagation of optical pulses in some specific medium, the team said.

It was later found to be a visual effect, but researchers thought it might still be possible for a single photon to exceed light speed."

It is a specific circumstance where it looked like time travel might be possible. That specific circumstance has been ruled out. It says nothing about any other possible solution to time travel.

Yes, I saw that statement but infered that the "ruled out" applied to ALL possible mechanisms somehow. Thanks for that clarification
 
  • #81
Well it seems like if we can't bend the rules enough for a single photon, a very tiny piece of information, then it doesn't hold much hope for real time travel with photons or anything else.

Time travel might involve having to leave and re-enter this universe entirely, but that doesn't make sense with any real Physics I know of.
This also assumes the past actually exists to be able to enter it and not a perpetual infinitesimally wide present.
 
  • #82
Tanelorn said:
Well it seems like if we can't bend the rules enough for a single photon, a very tiny piece of information, then it doesn't hold much hope for real time travel with photons or anything else.

Well, that's like of like saying, if we can't bend the rules enough for a pig to fly, it doesn't hold much hope for American Airlines.
 
  • #83
lol. Well that is another way of looking at it I guess.

Another way of looking at my view is that time is more like a singularity than a dimension in which one can travel up and down. ie. Only the present ever exists because the present, which is where the 3Dimensions of space exist, is only infinitessimal width.

A similar way of looking at it is that the preset, where all the action is going on, is like the stylus playing a record. ie. narrow as a singularity. The past and future exist as potential information only, but the stylus isn't there so you can't travel there because the action of energy conversion (or music) isn't playing there yet.

A computer processing information in a large file is also similar to the above.
 
Last edited:
  • #84
Tanelorn said:
lol. Well that is another way of looking at it I guess.

Another way of looking at my view is that time is more like a singularity than a dimension in which one can travel up and down. ie. Only the present ever exists because the present, which is where the 3Dimensions of space exist, is only infinitessimal width.

A similar way of looking at it is that the preset, where all the action is going on, is like the stylus playing a record. ie. narrow as a singularity. The past and future exist as potential information only, but the stylus isn't there so you can't travel there because the action of energy conversion (or music) isn't playing there yet.

A computer processing information in a large file is also similar to the above.

These are all examples of traveling though one spatial dimension at a constant rate through the time dimension; which is unfortunately not doing much to illuminate the issue.
 
  • #85
Dave, I think you are probably referring to the way in which time slows in a spaceship as one moves at near light speed through space?

My answer is that whilst I agree that the passage of time passes more slowly, the present time is still the only time ever being experienced inside the spaceship during the journey. So, for me, I still don't think I could describe time as being like a dimension of space that I can move forward or back, only the present ever exists and only in the present does matter and energy exist and interact. The rest is been and gone and exists only in history books and the future is yet to be.

The matter and energy of neither the future nor the past can interact in any way with the matter and energy of the present. We could today be occupying the same spatial coordinates as a supermassive black hole, but there isn't even a quantum of interaction on the matter of the present in the same location. I think we may well have all been overly influenced by H G Wells and Dr Who et al into seeing time in the wrong way.
 
Last edited:
  • #86
Tanelorn said:
My answer is that whilst I agree that the passage of time passes more slowly, the present time is still the only time ever being experienced inside the spaceship during the journey. So, for me, I still don't think I could describe time as being like a dimension of space that I can move forward or back, only the present ever exists and only in the present does matter and energy exist and interact. The rest is been and gone and exists only in history books and the future is yet to be.

I see your point, and it is reasonable, but it is impossible (I think) to discuss some relativistic effects without reference to time as a dimention and it is absolutely standard in physics to treat time as a dimension in the 4d existence that is space-time.
 
  • #87
Tanelorn said:
So, for me, I still don't think I could describe time as being like a dimension of space that I can move forward or back,

Correct. Because it is not like that.

The key thing about a time-like dimension, as opposed to a space-like dimension, is that we are constrained to move through it only forward, and only at a fixed speed.
 
  • #88
So the basis for ever achieving true Time Travel is exceedingly weak? i.e. backwards and forwards at will and at any speed.
 
  • #89
Tanelorn said:
So the basis for ever achieving true Time Travel is exceedingly weak? i.e. backwards and forwards at will and at any speed.

I think "weak" is a very strong categorization of the basis. "Nonexistant" may not be true, but I think it would be closer to the current understanding.
 
  • #90
Tanelorn said:
So the basis for ever achieving true Time Travel is exceedingly weak? i.e. backwards and forwards at will and at any speed.

Forward time travel - assuming the caveat that we have relatavistic travel, is entirely plausable. Future destination time could even be factored into the equation to arrive at a certain "when".

Backwards time travel is altogether different, barring CTCs, tachyons and the doctors TARDIS it is highly unlikely this is possible - you would need FTL. If we could go FTL, we could time travel but again I don't think it possible to ever achieve true FTL and I think it unlikely there is a mechanism which allows "percieved" FTL travel.

Just my two cents worth :smile:
 
<h2>1. What is time travel?</h2><p>Time travel is the concept of moving between different points in time. It is a hypothetical concept that has been explored in science fiction and theoretical physics.</p><h2>2. What are the main theories of time travel?</h2><p>The main theories of time travel include the theory of special relativity, the theory of general relativity, and the theory of quantum mechanics. These theories offer different explanations for how time travel could be possible.</p><h2>3. What factors affect the possibility of time travel?</h2><p>Factors that affect the possibility of time travel include the speed of light, the curvature of space-time, and the existence of closed timelike curves. These factors are all related to the theories of special and general relativity.</p><h2>4. Is time travel scientifically possible?</h2><p>Currently, time travel is not considered scientifically possible. While there are some theoretical models that suggest it could be possible, there is no empirical evidence to support it. Additionally, the concept of time travel raises many paradoxes and logical inconsistencies.</p><h2>5. How does time travel relate to the concept of causality?</h2><p>Time travel raises questions about causality, which is the relationship between cause and effect. If time travel were possible, it could potentially create paradoxes where an event could cause itself, leading to logical inconsistencies. This is known as the grandfather paradox and is a major challenge to the possibility of time travel.</p>

1. What is time travel?

Time travel is the concept of moving between different points in time. It is a hypothetical concept that has been explored in science fiction and theoretical physics.

2. What are the main theories of time travel?

The main theories of time travel include the theory of special relativity, the theory of general relativity, and the theory of quantum mechanics. These theories offer different explanations for how time travel could be possible.

3. What factors affect the possibility of time travel?

Factors that affect the possibility of time travel include the speed of light, the curvature of space-time, and the existence of closed timelike curves. These factors are all related to the theories of special and general relativity.

4. Is time travel scientifically possible?

Currently, time travel is not considered scientifically possible. While there are some theoretical models that suggest it could be possible, there is no empirical evidence to support it. Additionally, the concept of time travel raises many paradoxes and logical inconsistencies.

5. How does time travel relate to the concept of causality?

Time travel raises questions about causality, which is the relationship between cause and effect. If time travel were possible, it could potentially create paradoxes where an event could cause itself, leading to logical inconsistencies. This is known as the grandfather paradox and is a major challenge to the possibility of time travel.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
65
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
0
Views
599
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
Back
Top