My book made the following claim... but I don't understand why it's true:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If [tex]v_1, v_2, v_3, v_4[/tex] is a basis for the vector space [tex]\mathbb{R}^4[/tex], and if [tex]W[/tex] is a subspace, then there exists a [tex]W[/tex] which has a basis which is not some subset of the [tex]v[/tex]'s.

The book provided a proof by counterexample: Let [tex]v_1 = (1, 0, 0, 0) ... v_2 = (0, 0, 0, 1)[/tex]. If [tex]W[/tex] is the line through [tex](1, 2, 3, 4)[/tex], then none of the [tex]v[/tex]'s are in [tex]W[/tex].

Is it just me, or does this not make any sense? First of all, (1,2,3,4) is a linear combination of (1,0,0,0)...(0,0,0,1), isn't it?

I'm very confused...

Any help would be greatly appreciated :).

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Basis of a Subspace

Loading...

Similar Threads - Basis Subspace | Date |
---|---|

I Basis of a Subspace of a Vector Space | Jan 1, 2017 |

I Orthogonal basis to find projection onto a subspace | Oct 30, 2016 |

Connection between subspace, span, and basis? | Oct 18, 2015 |

Is it possible to determine a basis for non-subspace spaces? | Dec 9, 2014 |

Extending the basis of a T-invariant subspace | Sep 11, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**