Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Be your self, no matter what they say!

  1. Apr 1, 2004 #1
    Those that follow my posts are well awear of how serious are my objections to the traditional physics. They must at some point question them self: How can the traditional physics be wrong despite all the progress mankind makes?
    The answer is simple:
    I can put A + B = RESULT
    They can put A + B + ERROR = RESULT + ERROR
    Two ways make true claim but RESULT <> RESULT + ERROR
    The point is:
    Be your self as long as you don't contradict your self!
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 1, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    Sure, but experiment (i.e., nature) will only agree with either RESULT or RESULT+ERROR.
  4. Apr 1, 2004 #3
    Deda ... sorry mate ... your objection to traditional physics has crossed over into maths.

    Before you can write ...

    A + B = RESULT

    ... you must define what type of entities A, B, RESULT and ERROR are and what '+' and '=' mean.

    Otherwise, it's just gibberish.
  5. Apr 2, 2004 #4
    A, B, Result & Error are quantities of same quality.
    '+' is the standard math operator for addition
    '=' is again standard sign for equality.
  6. Apr 2, 2004 #5

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    And now you've got to define quality, and explain why you are allowed to use the 'standard math operation for addition' on things like that. You might have a useful shorthanc for creating a picture of your opinion (though it is not clear to most of us I'd suggest), but it's not rigorous, is it?
  7. Apr 2, 2004 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    About being yourself, if you are a serial killer, hitman (any kind of murderer really), rapist, pedophile, telemarketer etc., please stop being yourself immediately.

  8. Apr 2, 2004 #7
    Following on frm Matt Grime's comment ...

    If you want to use '+' and '=' as the 'standard math operators' then the quantities you are considering must be a subset of the complex numbers. So, let's look at your arguments again, but not using 'handy' words that sort of look like they may contradict themselves in English:

    Let A, B and D be complex and C = A + B.
    Then, A + B + D = C + D.

    So, C <> C + D, but if and only if D <> 0. If D = 0, then D = C + D !!

    Where's the contradiction?

    Your trouble is with trying to make Maths out of English. Why you feel the need to find such holes in maths or physics, I have no idea, but you'd use your time much better if you learnt the rules of the game first.

  9. Apr 2, 2004 #8
    Maybe I haven't been paying attention, but as far as I know, I have never
    witnessed a single event on this planet that didn't square with "traditional physics". Therefore, I must object to your objections.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook