Bell's Spaceship Paradox & Length Contraction

  • #76
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
9,738
961
The string in Bell's scenario doesn't get shorter, so the contracted binding EM fields have to span the same distances. Hence the tension. To avoid the complications of QM don't go down to the atomic level, but instead consider the contracting links of a chain that is forced to keep a constant length.
I agree. If one has a rod or string which one divide into classical pieces of matter, then, when the rod undergoes length contraction, so does each of the pieces of the rod.

It doesn't matter to the argument how small each of the pieces is.

It does matter to the argument that we consider the pieces to behave classically. It's unclear to me how one rigorously deals with the quantum aspects, but this argument can go in another forum such as the quantum forum. I would guess that there is some sort of classical limit one can take, but I've never seen a serious formal discussion of the issue. This doesn't mean that one may not exist, as I'm not too familiar with the appropriate literature, unfortunately.
 
  • #77
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2019 Award
29,653
8,927
It's unclear to me how one rigorously deals with the quantum aspects, but this argument can go in another forum such as the quantum forum.
Exactly.
 

Related Threads on Bell's Spaceship Paradox & Length Contraction

Replies
137
Views
15K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Last Post
5
Replies
104
Views
20K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
642
Top