- #1

- 358

- 120

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- A
- Thread starter andresB
- Start date

- #1

- 358

- 120

- #2

- 33,542

- 11,954

Moderator's note: modified thread title a bit to make it more descriptive.

- #3

atyy

Science Advisor

- 14,349

- 2,592

Gravity and Strings (see Chapter 3)

Tomás Ortín

https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00319

EPFL Lectures on General Relativity as a Quantum Field Theory

John F. Donoghue, Mikhail M. Ivanov, Andrey Shkerin

- #4

haushofer

Science Advisor

- 2,492

- 883

https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.3735

Focussing on massive gravity, it contains a great review of Fierz-Pauli.

- #5

- 9,979

- 1,155

Note that the "flat" metric turns out not to be physically observable. How - and even if - the whole approach deals with black holes isn't particularly clear to me.

abstract said:A pedagogical description of a simple ungeometrical approach to General Relativity is given, which follows the pattern of well understood field theories, such as electrodynamics. This leads quickly to most of the important weak field predictions, as well as to the radiation damping of binary pulsars. Moreover, certain consistency arguments imply that the theory has to be generally invariant, and therefore one is bound to end up with Einstein's field equations. Although this field theoretic approach, which has been advocated repeatedly by a number of authors, starts with a spin-2 theory on Minkowski spacetime, it turns out in the end that the flat metric is actually unobservable, and that the physical metric is curved and dynamical.

Short sections are devoted to tensor-scalar generalizations, the mystery of the vacuum energy density, and quintessence.

Share: