Beth Tableaux

  • Thread starter EvLer
  • Start date
can anyone recommend a good source on practicing with Beth Tableaux? It is an interesting idea, but my textbook does not contain a whole lot about it.
I tried googling but it does not produce anything helpful, most of the stuff is too advanced for me.
Is it still generally applicable?
Thanks in advance.


Gold Member
Are you also studying semantic tableaux or truth trees or something like that- it's called different things? The one not so clear explanation google turned up sounds very similar. You can find an explanation of what I'm talking about here: [Broken]
If that is the same thing, you can find plenty more examples. Just try the other names- truth trees, semantic tableaux.

Edit: Actually, are you just looking for practice problems? If so, you can just make up your own :) , use the arguments in your book, or there are several in the link above.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, the link discusses the same idea. I am going through the book on my own, so I wasn't sure about other names. I'll search for that.
Thanks a lot!


Gold Member
Sure. Do you understand how it works- why you negate the conclusion and such?

As far as constructing the tableaux, the hardest thing to keep straight is when to branch and when not to branch. I never bothered to learn all of the rules for whether to branch or not, because you only need two of them: For a disjunction, branch; For a conjunction or literal, don't branch. I just convert all of my propositions to disjunctions or conjunctions first, then construct the tableaux.
For example, you should already know that (P -> Q) <=> (~P v Q). So instead of learning the rule for implications, you can just learn the rule for disjunctions and convert your implications to disjunctions before you add them to the tableaux. Make sense?

Related Threads for: Beth Tableaux

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving