1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Betz Law

  1. Sep 17, 2012 #1
    Betz Limit

    The amount of power in wind can be expressed as: 0.5*M*(V^2), where M=mass flow rate.

    As per my knowledge, we assume M to be constant regardless of where we are measuring it, downstream, upstream or close to the wind turbine.

    If measuring close to the wind turbine, the expression for M would be:
    M=ρ*S*Vb

    where S=the area sweeped by the wind turbine blades and Vb=velocity of wind at the blades


    Now, When finding the power coefficient, why do we take the reference power for the Betz efficiency calculation to be equal to 0.5*ρ*S*(Vd^3), where Vd=velocity of wind downstream

    The above expression for reference power (or total power available in the wind) could also be written as:
    0.5*(ρ*S*Vd)*Vd^2

    So here we are assuming that the cross-sectional area of wind downstream is the same as the cross-sectional area of wind close to the turbine, which appears to be wrong because then the mass flow rate would no longer be constant!

    It seems to me that the reference power (or total power available in the wind) should actually be:
    Pref=0.5*M*Vd^2
    =0.5*ρ*S*Vb*(Vd^2)

    But then, this expression is useless because we dont know the value of Vb..except that Vb=0.5*(Vd+Vu)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 17, 2012 #2

    AlephZero

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The total power available from the wind is the power "flowing" throigh the area of the turbine, when the turbine is not there. That is what your first fornula 0.5*M*(V^2) says.

    Of course there is no way to extract some of the power without changing the wind flow in some way. That's why you can't make a turbine that is 100% efficient.
     
  4. Sep 17, 2012 #3
    Thanks a lot! This problem was troubling me quite a bit.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Betz Law
  1. Pascal's law and pistons (Replies: 12)

Loading...