Probability of at Least 14 Not Having ETFs in 25 Investor Portfolios

In summary: So, the probability is P(X<=13)= P(X=0) + P(X=1) + ... + P(X=13) = 0.7260. In summary, the conversation discussed the binomial cumulative distribution and the probability that at least 14 out of 25 investors do not have exchange-traded funds in their portfolios. The correct calculation for this probability is P(X<=13) = 0.7260, which is the cumulative probability of 13 or less investors not having exchange-traded funds. The mistake in the original calculation was taking the cumulative probability of 11 or less, instead of 13 or less. This highlights the importance of understanding the question being asked and how it relates to the given
  • #1
koudai8
9
0
Hi, the following is a list of binomial cumulative distribution of the probability that out of 25 investors, the number of investors that would have exchange-traded funds in their portfolios.

We were asked for the probability that at least 14 investors do not have exchange-traded funds in their portfolios from this table.

Binomial
n 25
p 0.4800

xi P(X<=xi)
0 0.0000
1 0.0000
2 0.0000
3 0.0002
4 0.0009
5 0.0037
6 0.0124
7 0.0342
8 0.0795
9 0.1585
10 0.2751
11 0.4220
12 0.5801
13 0.7260
14 0.8415
15 0.9197
16 0.9648
17 0.9868
18 0.9959
19 0.9989
20 0.9998
21 1.0000
22 1.0000
23 1.0000
24 1.0000
25 1.0000

Here is what I did: since they ask for at least 14 do not, it means 11 or less do. So the answer is .422---the cumulative of 11 and less that do.

But when I used the Binomial Cumulative Distribution function on my calculator Binomcdf (25, 0.52, 14), I get 0.725.

Where did I do wrong?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey koudai8 and welcome to the forums.

Since we are given P(X = x) = probability that x people have exchange traded funds, then what is the probability P(Y = y) where y people do not have exchange traded funds related to P(X = x) (In other words how can we write P(Y = y) in terms P(X = x)?
 
  • #3
Is it not 0.52? (probability)
 
  • #4
koudai8 said:
since they ask for at least 14 do not, it means 11 or less do. So the answer is .422---the cumulative of 11 and less that do.

But when I used the Binomial Cumulative Distribution function on my calculator Binomcdf (25, 0.52, 14), I get 0.725..


Atleast 14 do not means 13 or less do,not 11 or less.The compliment of atleast 14 is atmost 13.
 
  • #5


I would suggest checking your calculator function and inputs to make sure they are correct. It is possible that you may have entered the wrong values or used the wrong function. Additionally, it is important to note that the given table is based on a probability of 0.48 (p=0.48), while your calculator function is using a probability of 0.52 (p=0.52). This could also be a factor in the discrepancy between your calculated answer and the answer from the table. It is always important to double check your work and use the correct values when making calculations.
 

1. What is the probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs?

The probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs can be calculated using a binomial distribution. This takes into account the number of trials (25 portfolios), the desired number of successes (14 portfolios not having ETFs), and the probability of success (the likelihood of a portfolio not having ETFs).

2. How is the probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs affected by the overall percentage of portfolios without ETFs?

The probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs is directly affected by the overall percentage of portfolios without ETFs. As the overall percentage of portfolios without ETFs increases, the probability of at least 14 out of 25 portfolios not having ETFs also increases. This is because the probability of success in the binomial distribution increases.

3. Can the probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs be used to predict future portfolio trends?

No, the probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs is a mathematical calculation based on the given parameters and cannot be used to predict future portfolio trends. Other factors, such as market trends and individual investor choices, also play a significant role in determining portfolio trends.

4. What does a higher probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs indicate?

A higher probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs indicates that there is a higher chance that a significant portion of the investor portfolios will not have ETFs. This could potentially mean that ETFs are not a popular investment choice among these investors or that there may be some other factor influencing their investment decisions.

5. How can the probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs be used in portfolio management?

The probability of at least 14 out of 25 investor portfolios not having ETFs can be used as a benchmark for portfolio managers to assess the overall trend of ETF investments among their clients. It can also serve as a guide for making decisions on whether to include or exclude ETFs from their clients' portfolios based on their investment preferences.

Back
Top