Exploring Black Hole Acceleration: Can Objects Reach c Velocity?

In summary, objects with mass cannot be accelerated to the speed of light. However, in the Painleve space-time, the velocity of a falling object relative to a black hole can reach c at the horizon. This is due to the event horizon being a null worldline, or a collection of them, which can be thought of as trapped light. The infalling particle's worldline remains timelike and does not change its nature, while the event horizon is lightlike. This means that the relative velocity between the two is always equal to c. In GR, there are no forces or acceleration, making it difficult to explain mathematically in layman's terms.
  • #1
cosmic.ash
7
0
can a black hole accelerate an object to c(because its escape v is greater than c)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
cosmic.ash said:
can a black hole accelerate an object to c(because its escape v is greater than c)

Nothing with mass can be accelerated to c.

Objects falling into a BH will be accelerated relative to an outside observer to near light speed, however the definition of the actual speed is a local one and will depend on the coordinate system used.

Garth
 
  • #3
In the Painleve space-time, which is the frame of an observer falling into a Schwarzschild BH from infinity, the velocity of the faller reaches c (wrt to the BH) exactly at the horizon. Which is nice and symmetrical.
 
  • #4
The good news is that the relative velocity of the event horizon and a particle falling into it when the particle crosses the event horizon is always 'c'.

The bad news is that it is not really correct to think of the particle as being accelerated up to the speed of light. The worldline of the infalling particle is known as "timelike" - this is a characteristic of the worldline of all particles, and is different in nature of the worldline of light, which is "null".

The event horizon is a null worldline (or a collection of them, to be more precise). In fact, you can think of the event horizon as trapped light.

So the worldline of the infalling particle never changes its timelike nature, and the reason that the relative velocity between the event horizon an the infalling particle is equal to 'c' is that the event horizon is lightlike rather than timelike.
 
  • #5
Pervect, thanks for the clarification. Having no forces or acceleration in GR-speak certainly makes it difficult to explain things in layman's terms.
 
  • #6
can u explain mathematically
 

1. What is a black hole and how does it accelerate objects?

A black hole is a region in space with an extremely strong gravitational pull, created by the collapse of a massive star. This gravitational pull causes objects to accelerate towards the black hole at high speeds.

2. Can objects actually reach the speed of light (c) when falling into a black hole?

No, according to Einstein's theory of relativity, the speed of light is the maximum speed an object can travel. As an object approaches a black hole, it will accelerate towards the speed of light but never reach it.

3. How does the acceleration of objects near a black hole compare to Earth's acceleration due to gravity?

The acceleration near a black hole is significantly stronger than Earth's acceleration due to gravity. This is because the mass of a black hole is much larger and more concentrated than Earth's mass.

4. Are there any objects that can escape the acceleration of a black hole?

Yes, there are certain objects that can escape the strong gravitational pull of a black hole. These objects, known as jets, are powerful streams of energy that are ejected from a black hole's poles at high speeds.

5. How does the size of a black hole affect its ability to accelerate objects?

The size of a black hole does not affect its ability to accelerate objects. The gravitational pull and acceleration near a black hole are determined by its mass, not its size.

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
525
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
830
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
362
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
2K
Back
Top