Black Hole Penrose Process: Understanding Negative Energy Condition

In summary: If the particle enters the ergosphere, its angular momentum must be negative (against the black hole's rotation)...
  • #1
binbagsss
1,254
11
##E= -T^uP_u ##,

where ##T^u## is the time-like killing vector associated with the Kerr Metric and ##P_u## is the 4-momentum of the particle. ##E## is the energy.

Outside the ergosphere ##T^u## is time-like and inside the ergosphere it is space-like. Therefore it can be arranged within the ergosphere that ##E= -T^uP_u <0. ## *

The condition for which this can be arranged is described so far as : particle's motion must be against the angular momentum of the black hole..

My Question:

I looked at a quick proof justifying that assuming negative energy of a particular particle within the ergosphere, ##E'##, its angular momentum ##L'## is negative (against the black hole's rotation) using the fact that the particle crosses the event horizon and by defining a new killing vector - linear combination of the time-like and angular killing vector, with the angular velocity of the event horizon -##\omega## - being a multiplicative constant:

##L'< \frac {E'}{\omega} ##

Question:

But, if ##L'## is negative, we can make no conclusion on the sign of ##E'##. So my interpretation so far is that the particles motion to be opposing the angular momentum of the black hole is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the particle to have negative energy.

My question then is, what further conditions must we impose so that * is space-like - and what do they physically correspond to ? I.e- I see that the scalar product of a TL vector with a SL can be null, SL or TL- how do you formulate the relationship / relationships between the components of the vectors/vectors forming the scalar product so that we know what the resulting nature will be and , if this is formulated for * does this give the corresponding physical conditions that must additionally be imposed so that the particle's energy is negative?

(I've had a google around but can't find anything).

If anyone could help me ut or lead me to some helpful resources that would be extremely appreciated ! Thank you !


 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
binbagsss said:
I looked at a quick proof justifying that assuming negative energy of a particular particle within the ergosphere, ##E'##, its angular momentum ##L'## is negative (against the black hole's rotation)

First of all, ##L'## being negative does not mean the particle must be moving in a retrograde (against the hole's rotation) orbit. It only means that the particle's angular velocity must be less than that of a zero angular momentum observer, or ZAMO. The ZAMO's angular velocity is zero at infinity, and gradually rises until it approaches ##\omega##, the angular velocity of the horizon, as the horizon is approached. Any observer with an angular velocity less than that of a ZAMO at the same position, even if the angular velocity is still positive, will have a negative angular momentum ##L'##.

This is important because, within the ergosphere, retrograde orbits (negative angular velocity) are impossible! In fact, even zero angular velocity (staying at the same angular coordinates forever) is impossible. All timelike worldlines have positive angular velocity, because of the "frame dragging" due to the hole's rotation.

(Some sources do use the term "counter-rotating" to describe orbits within the ergosphere; what they actually mean is orbits with angular velocity less than the ZAMO angular velocity. As noted above, this angular velocity must still be positive within the ergosphere.)

That said, if you could give a reference to your "quick proof", it would be very helpful. It's hard to know what you need help with if we don't know what you've already seen.

binbagsss said:
what further conditions must we impose so that * is space-like

I'm not sure what you mean by "spacelike" here. The Killing vector field ##T^u## is spacelike everywhere inside the ergosphere. The 4-momentum ##P_u## is never spacelike; it's timelike (at least for any object with nonzero invariant mass). The energy ##E## is a scalar; it's just a number, not a vector, so it isn't spacelike or timelike. So what exactly are you asking?

If you're asking what the conditions are for ##E## to be negative, I think it will be easier to answer if you give a reference to the quick proof you mention.

binbagsss said:
I see that the scalar product of a TL vector with a SL can be null, SL or TL

A note: this exhibits the same confusion as above. Scalars are not spacelike or timelike or null; they're just numbers. I think what you're really trying to say here is that the scalar product of a timelike vector and a spacelike vector can be zero, positive, or negative.
 
  • #3
A note: this exhibits the same confusion as above. Scalars are not spacelike or timelike or null; they're just numbers. I think what you're really trying to say here is that the scalar product of a timelike vector and a spacelike vector can be zero, positive, or negative.[/QUOTE]

Sorry my bad here ! Yhep I meant just pos/neg/zero.
Source: (page 214) : http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9712019.pdf
 
  • #4
binbagsss said:
Source: (page 214)

Ah, ok. This source (unfortunately) uses the confusing language I referred to above; when it says "moving against the hole's rotation", it means negative angular momentum, but not negative angular velocity (which, as I said before, and as this source agrees, is impossible within the ergosphere).

Equation 7.144 here shows that, if the energy at infinity ##E## is negative, the angular momentum ##L## must also be negative; but it does not show what is required for ##E## itself to be negative. I don't see anywhere that it gets more specific than equation 7.138, which is just the equation for ##E## in terms of the appropriate Killing vector field. To get any more information about what it takes for ##E## to be negative, you would have to expand out equation 7.138 in terms of known quantities like the hole's mass and angular momentum. I don't have time to go into that now, but you might want to try it to see what you come up with.
 
  • #5


The Penrose process is a theoretical concept that involves extracting energy from a rotating black hole. In this process, a particle with negative energy enters the ergosphere of the black hole, where the spacetime is dragged along with the rotation of the black hole. This allows for the particle to have negative energy relative to an observer outside the ergosphere.

In order for this process to occur, the particle must have a negative angular momentum, as you have mentioned. This is because the angular momentum of the particle must be opposite to the angular momentum of the black hole in order for the particle to enter the ergosphere. However, as you have also noted, this is not a sufficient condition for the particle to have negative energy.

To understand the additional conditions that must be imposed, we need to consider the definition of the energy of a particle in general relativity. In general relativity, the energy of a particle is defined as the time component of its 4-momentum, which is given by the scalar product of the time-like killing vector and the 4-momentum of the particle. In the case of the Penrose process, this scalar product is negative, indicating that the particle has negative energy.

In order for this scalar product to be negative, both the time-like killing vector and the 4-momentum of the particle must have the same sign. This means that the time component of the killing vector and the time component of the 4-momentum must have the same sign. In other words, the particle must be moving in the same direction as the time-like killing vector, which is towards the future. This is a necessary condition for the particle to have negative energy.

Additionally, the particle must also have a negative energy-momentum tensor, which is a measure of the energy and momentum density of the particle. This condition is related to the negative energy density of the particle inside the ergosphere, which is required for the Penrose process to occur.

In summary, the necessary conditions for a particle to have negative energy in the Penrose process are: 1) the particle must have negative angular momentum, 2) the particle must be moving in the same direction as the time-like killing vector, and 3) the particle must have a negative energy-momentum tensor. These conditions ensure that the particle has negative energy relative to an observer outside the ergosphere, allowing for the extraction of energy from the black hole.
 

1. What is the Black Hole Penrose Process?

The Black Hole Penrose Process is a theoretical mechanism proposed by Sir Roger Penrose in 1969 to explain how a black hole can extract energy from its rotation. According to this process, a particle can enter the ergosphere of a rotating black hole and split into two particles, with one escaping the black hole and the other falling into its event horizon. The escaping particle gains energy from the black hole's rotation, resulting in a net energy extraction from the black hole.

2. How does the Black Hole Penrose Process violate the Negative Energy Condition?

The Negative Energy Condition states that the energy density at any point in space must be non-negative. However, in the Black Hole Penrose Process, the escaping particle gains energy from the black hole's rotation, resulting in a decrease in the black hole's energy and a negative energy density in that region. This violates the Negative Energy Condition and has led to debates among scientists about the validity of this process.

3. Can the Black Hole Penrose Process be observed or tested?

Currently, there is no direct evidence or observation of the Black Hole Penrose Process. However, scientists have proposed several indirect methods to test its validity, such as looking for signatures of negative energy in the Hawking radiation emitted by black holes or studying the accretion disks around black holes. These methods are still being researched and have not yet been confirmed.

4. How does the Black Hole Penrose Process contribute to our understanding of black holes?

The Black Hole Penrose Process is one of the proposed mechanisms that could explain how black holes can emit energy, which was previously thought to be impossible due to their strong gravitational pull. It also sheds light on the connection between the rotation of black holes and their energy extraction abilities. However, further research and observations are needed to fully understand and confirm the role of this process in black hole physics.

5. Are there any potential applications of the Black Hole Penrose Process?

As of now, there are no known practical applications of the Black Hole Penrose Process. However, understanding the energy extraction mechanisms of black holes could have implications for future space travel and energy generation technologies. It could also help us better understand the behavior of other astrophysical objects, such as neutron stars and active galactic nuclei.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
508
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
67
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
63
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
982
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top