# Blackhole and Gravity

1. Apr 22, 2016

### i_hate_math

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The radius Rh of a black hole is the radius of a mathematical sphere, called the event horizon, that is centered on the black hole. Information from events inside the event horizon cannot reach the outside world. According to Einstein's general theory of relativity, Rh = 2GM/c2, where M is the mass of the black hole and c is the speed of light.

Suppose that you wish to study a black hole near it, at a radial distance of 43Rh. However, you do not want the difference in gravitational acceleration between your feet and your head to exceed 10 m/s2 when you are feet down (or head down) toward the black hole. (a) Take your height to be 2.0 m. What is the limit to the mass of the black hole you can tolerate at the given radial distance? Give the ratio of this mass to the mass MS of our Sun. (b) Is the ratio an upper limit estimate or a lower limit estimate?

2. Relevant equations
Rh = 2GM/c^2
Fg=GmM/R^2
Fg=m*a

3. The attempt at a solution
Using the two expressions of the gravitational attraction: a=GM/(R+∂R)^2=10
and we have R=43*Rh=86GM/c^2
and my height is ∂R=2 metres
now sub the expression for R in, and do the massive calculation I got M=1.0125*10^32 kg
the sun has mass Msun=1.99*10^30 kg
thus the ratios is M/Msun=50.879...
This is not however the correct answer
Please let me know where I might have gone wrong

2. Apr 22, 2016

### haruspex

Note the first word below:

3. Apr 22, 2016

### i_hate_math

Oh I see, so it should be a=GM/(∂R)^2 instead of the whole thing

4. Apr 22, 2016

### haruspex

No, it's the difference between two accelerations. Find the expressions for the accelerations and THEN take the difference.

5. Apr 22, 2016

### i_hate_math

a(feet)=a=GM/(R)^2
and a(difference)=10=GM/(R+∂R)^2-GM/(R)^2
does that look right?

6. Apr 22, 2016

### haruspex

Yes, except there's a good chance you have a sign error.

7. Apr 22, 2016

### i_hate_math

Thanks a lot. I just found another way to do this(should've read the text book thru thoroughly), they used the differential eq, a=GM/(R)^2 becomes da=-GM/(R)^3 dR where dR=h=2 and subbing in everything this is much easier

8. Apr 22, 2016

### haruspex

The next step from post #5 (after fixing the sign error) would have been to use the binomial expansion of (R+∂R)-2 and make the approximation for small ∂R/R. That comes to the same as taking the differential.

9. Apr 23, 2016

### i_hate_math

I see, i would go with the other method to avoid calculating errors, but thank you very much.