Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Blackhole question

  1. Jul 2, 2005 #1
    Hello everyone!
    I'm a student in the UK who just finished my GCSE's and im very interesting in physics particularly quantum physics, though i have little knowledge of it. So a blackhole is also called a "quantum singularity"? And it is an object with near infite mass and little/no volume (correct me if im wrong). What i don't understand is, the shape of a black hole is like that of a funnel, with the singularity at the bottom of this funnel and an acceleration disc at the top, and this suggests its a 3d shape but is it. How can it be if the matter is being pulled into the singualirty and there is only one acceleration disc? Surely if you were to go around the back of a black hole it would appear empty? I don't know if i make sense and i know i sound stupid but im just interested to find out.

    Izz
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 2, 2005 #2

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    In general relativity, which is non-quantum, the center of the black hole is just a classical singularity; the density goes to infinity there. But there is current effort to quantize GR gravity (see the subforum "Strings Branes and LQG" for news about that). And in some of these quantization programs, the singularity goes away, due to, for example, the operation of the uncertainty principle at short ranges.
     
  4. Jul 2, 2005 #3

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    To address some other points - non-rotating black holes are really spherical. The funnel shape that you see associated with them is an embedding diagram, not what they really look like.

    For a description of what the term "embedding diagram" means, and a java applet, see

    http://www.opensourcephysics.org/talks/osp_curriculum/applet_html/embedding.html
     
  5. Jul 2, 2005 #4
    the applet doesn't load but, so that means that the singularity is at the core of a black hole? thanks anyway, now i feel stupid :cry:

    delete this topic someone :cry:
     
  6. Jul 2, 2005 #5

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Chill out a bit, izzie - having your browser fail to load a java applet may be a bummer and a bit frustrating, but it doesn't make you stupid.
     
  7. Jul 4, 2005 #6
    it looks like the specific type of black hole that you are speaking of is a classical swarzchild blackhole (i hope i spelled his mane right) in such an instance there would be a conained singularity, and this could be described in such a way as you have mentioned, though this is only one theory, not all include the necessity of a singularity
     
  8. Jul 4, 2005 #7
    and ohh yeah, in such a case the singularity would be at the core of a black hole and would most likely consist of a mainly neutron comprised matter
     
  9. Jul 4, 2005 #8

    amt

    User Avatar

    From the diagram applet, it seems like the singularity bottoms out when the Mass=1.

    What's happening there? Is 1 some critical point?
     
  10. Jul 4, 2005 #9

    pervect

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    When M=1, the object becomes a black hole. The embedding diagram then stops at the event horizon, where the equations used to derive it become singular. (This is the coordinate singularity at the event horizon, not to be confused with the true physical singularity at r=0).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Blackhole question
  1. Blackholes and planets (Replies: 3)

  2. Entropy in a blackhole (Replies: 3)

  3. Blueshift and Blackholes (Replies: 12)

Loading...