Blood Assay for Cancers

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,253
7,607
Science magazine news reports on a blood assay for a number of cancers, done all at once.
It detected between 33% and 98% of cases with <1% false positives.
it uses a combination of detecting DNA and proteins.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon and Choppy

Answers and Replies

  • #2
18,951
9,268
Could this say be something you could test daily at home for or something you'd do in person with a yearly physical?
 
  • #3
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2022 Award
2,253
7,607
Currently, it is not a cheap test (I think I read ~$500) and it probably has to be done in a lab.
From my reading, it would probably be a test for DNA markers and another test for some protein markers.
So I'm thinking like a blood lab test you get a physical rather than something you could do at home.
 
  • #4
18,951
9,268
So I'm thinking like a blood lab test you get a physical rather than something you could do at home.
I can't wait for at home tests. I'm so paranoid!
 
  • #5
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,522
4,181
Given that it's a blood test (the paper says they used about 7.5 mL of plasma), it's likely something that would have to be done at a doctor's office as most people would not have the experience or equipment to draw their own blood. At at home version would only be feasible if it were sensitive enough to work on a few drops of blood (<<1mL). Still, as with many of these types of diagnostics, it is very helpful to have a doctor or someone knowledgeable be able to help the patient interpret the test results.
 
  • #6
Laroxe
Science Advisor
508
586
While I'm sure these tests will become better and cheaper the idea of home testing every day would probably be a very bad idea. If you look at some of the problems associated with mass screening, the same problems would be present. Its quite likely that there will always be abnormal cells in our body which will never progress to causing disease, so any positive test would need repeated testing and further investigation. This would lead to increased cost and possibly expose people to invasive investigations or dangerous treatments, this was a problem with the PSA test for prostate problems. It may be that even simple things like yearly physicals should only really be done at ages where there are established risks, it might invite unnecessary interventions and add to risk.
 

Suggested for: Blood Assay for Cancers

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
392
Replies
10
Views
888
Replies
3
Views
499
Replies
7
Views
572
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
766
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
574
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
Top