Let (A_n)_n>=1 be any event in some probability space { Omega, F, P }, then(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

(i) SUM_n (P(A_n)) < oo => P( limsup_n->oo (A_n) ) = 0

(ii) If in addition the A_n are independent then

P( limsup_n->oo (A_n) ) <1 => SUM_n (P(A_n)) < oo

Does that mean if the A_n are independent then P( limsup_n->oo (A_n)) must be either 0 or 1??

If so, why bother using "<1" in (ii) and not just use "=0" instead?

If not, then when it is strictly between 0 and 1 we have

from (ii) that SUM_n (P(A_n)) < oo

and then from (i) we get P( limsup_n->oo (A_n) ) = 0, a contradiction.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Borel-Cantelli Lemma

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**