(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); "Borel resummation" is useful?

My question is if this is nothing but a "math tool" but not valid for realistic example, for example if we wish to calculate the divergent (but Borel summable) series:

[tex] a(0)+a(1)+a(2)+..................... =S [/tex]

then you take the expression : [tex] B(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{a(n). x^{n} }{n!} [/tex] ,

so the sum of the series is just "defined":

tex] a(0)+a(1)+a(2)+.....................=S=\int_{0}^{\infty}dxB(x)e^{-x} [/tex]

Of course if [tex] a(n)=(-1)^{n} [/tex] or [tex] a(n)=n! [/tex] then it's very easy to get B(x), but in a "realistic" situation that you don't even know the general term a(n) or it's very complicated there's no way to obtain its Borel sum

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Borel resummation is useful?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Borel resummation useful | Date |
---|---|

Lebesgue Measurable but not Borel sets. | Jul 30, 2012 |

Embedding L1 in the Banach space of complex Borel measures | Jun 11, 2012 |

Generating the Borel (sigma-)Algebra | Jan 26, 2012 |

Can Borel resummation be applied to integrals ? | Jul 23, 2007 |

Borel resummation | Aug 29, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**