1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Boundary values for integral

  1. Aug 8, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Find the volume between z = x2 + y2 and z = 2 - (x2 + y2).

    2. Relevant equations

    3. The attempt at a solution
    if r2 = x2 + y2
    then the lower part of the volume is defined by:
    r2 [itex]\leq[/itex] z [itex]\leq[/itex] 2 - r2
    and: 0 [itex]\leq[/itex] r [itex]\leq[/itex] 1
    the upper part by:
    2 - r2 [itex]\leq[/itex] z [itex]\leq[/itex] r2
    and: 1 [itex]\leq[/itex] r [itex]\leq[/itex] [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex]

    [itex]\int\int\int[/itex]1 dxdydz, after switching to polar coordinates I get
    [itex]\int\int\int[/itex]r drd[itex]\Theta[/itex]dz

    Theta varies from 0 to 2 pi. That leaves me with taking the integral with respect to r and z.
    I do it for z first, then finally for r. Then add the two volumes. But it's wrong.

    Any ideas?
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 8, 2011 #2
    those 2 curves intersect at x=1 and the plane z=1 , I would break it up into 2 parts and go from z=1 to the top of the paraboloid and then do the second part from the bottom paraboloid to the plane z=1 , because if you don't do that your radius is not always going to the same thing. Actually now that I look at it you kinda did that.
  4. Aug 8, 2011 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi Inertigratus! :smile:

    (have a square-root: √ and a pi: π and a ≤ :wink:)
    nooo :redface:, that's the whole of the volume :wink:
  5. Aug 9, 2011 #4
    Hehe, now you got me confused... :P
    It's the whole volume?
    I split it, because when r = 1, then 1 ≤ z ≤ 1, if you go up to r = √(2) then 2 ≤ z ≤ 0, which looks a bit weird since 0 is not greater than 2...
    So lower part from 0 ≤ r ≤ 1, upper part from 1 ≤ r ≤ √(2)
    Is that wrong? :P
  6. Aug 9, 2011 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I guess the question is: what do you mean by the "lower part"? What you have, [itex]2- r^2\le z\le r^2[/itex], is incorrect because the paraboloid [itex]z= 2- r^2[/itex] is above the parabolid [itex]z= r^2[/itex].
  7. Aug 9, 2011 #6
    It's confusing...
    Because, I know that when r = 0, then 2−r2 is obviously larger than r2.
    What's confusing me is that when r is increasing, and reaches r2 = 2, then the inequality doesn't make any sense. 2 ≤ z ≤ 0 makes no sense.
    So I was thinking as I said in my first post, that I would have to split it in to volumes.
    Above z = 1 and below z = 1.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook