Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

BPSK Spectrum question

  1. May 8, 2007 #1
    I have heard that the specturm for a BPSK signal looks like similar to the spectrum for DSBSC, but when I generate a BPSK signal and look at it on the spec an it does not look like DSBSC.

    I tried generating it with a Sig Gen using an internal square wave for the modulating signal and I also tried using an external square wave and then phase modulating that. I am using a phase deviation of 180 degrees, but the carrier does not appear to be very suppressed...

  2. jcsd
  3. May 8, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    BPSK is a digital modulation scheme, where the frequency is constant and only the phase is keyed (of course, this leads to some spectral energy spread around the "carrier").

    It should look nothing at all like DSBSC, which is an analog modulation scheme that purposefully intends to supress the carrier.

    Why did you expect them to be similar?

    - Warren
  4. May 8, 2007 #3
    Right...I am familiar with what BPSK is...

    I am also familiar with DSBSC.....and I do agree that I would not necessarily expect them to look similar...

    Unfortunately I cant go into much detail. Someone told me they should look similar and the results of the application do suggest a DSBSC type spectrum. Perhaps I heard him incorrectly and he wasn't using BPSK. Are there any other digital modulation schemes that would give a DSBSC type spectrum?
  5. Jul 3, 2007 #4
    According to this website:

    http://www.ece.eps.hw.ac.uk/Modules/B33cl2/Cl-9-03r.pdf [Broken]

    a BPSK signal does have a suppressed carrier. This is not the first time I have read this on a website or in a textbook. To quote the website....

    I have read this several times now, yet when I generated a BPSK signal it did not appear to have a suppressed carrier.

    I not sure where the disconnect is between what I am reading and what I saw in the lab. Anyone have any ideas?
    Last edited by a moderator: May 3, 2017
  6. Jul 3, 2007 #5
    Don't confuse "suppressed carrier" with a spectrum that has no power spectral density at your carrier frequency.

    Technically speaking, a non suppressed carrier will have a "delta function" at the carrier frequency. Practically, what this will mean in the lab is that your power reading on your spectrum analyzer will stay the same regardless of your resolution bandwidth setting. This will be true no matter how tightly you zoom in on the spectrum.

    A BPSK waveform with a random bitstream will have a power spectral density that looks a lot like a sinc function, centered on the carrier frequency. Note that this is a suppressed carrier, because there is no "delta function" at the carrier frequency. That is, as the resolution bandwidth decreases, the absolute power will decrease proportionally.

    In your pdf, the author is putting in a sequence of 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, ... which is hardly a "random" bitstream. When you crank through the math here, you get nothing at the carrier frequency.

    In this sense, I would agree that BPSK is similar to DSB-SC. On the other hand, on-off keying (OOK), would not be a suppressed carrier technique.

    As far as the specifics of your question, you will want to make sure that when you feed your modulator with a "1", you get one phase deviation, and when you feed it with a "0" you get 180 degrees different. Sometimes the modulator will want the input to be bipolar (1 = 5V, 0 = -5V, for example) and sometimes the modulator will want the input to be unipolar (1 = 5V, 0 = 0V, say)

    Hope this helps.

    PS A good text to look at for an introduction is Lathi or Haykin.
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 22, 2017
  7. Jul 3, 2007 #6

    Your comment about the res bandwidth is making me take a second look at suppressed carrier and unless I'm messing up the math...I believe you are correct here...

    Again I think you are correct....

    Ok...good. This is the type of "BPSK" I was referring to...not a random sequence.

    I've worked quite a bit with OOK so I'm pretty familiar with its spectrum, but haven't worked with BPSK as much...

    Hmmmm.....I might have forgot to take that into account, which I think would explain the spectrum I saw. It definitely was not suppressed carrier but had a somewhat flattened spectrum with plenty of power in the carrier.

    It does. Thanks.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook