- #1

- 611

- 24

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Mandelbroth
- Start date

- #1

- 611

- 24

- #2

- 239

- 46

Where did you encounter co-vectors in quantum theory? And what did they look like?

Cheers,

Jazz

Cheers,

Jazz

- #3

- 611

- 24

I didn't. I'm a math guy. :tongue:Where did you encounter co-vectors in quantum theory? And what did they look like?

Cheers,

Jazz

I read a thing on how the Riemann Hypothesis is related to quantum physics, and the article used some bras and kets. I assumed, from context, that a bra vector was essentially the same as a covector. I wanted to know if I was right.

- #4

WannabeNewton

Science Advisor

- 5,800

- 536

- #5

- 239

- 46

Hope this clears it up :)

Cheers,

Jazz

- #6

- 13,052

- 599

A co-vector is a more general notion than of a bra-vector, because you needn't have a topology, nor a scalar product to speak about vectors and co-vectors, but you need to have them to speak of bra-s and ket-s.

- #7

- 239

- 46

A co-vector is a more general notion than of a bra-vector, because you needn't have a topology, nor a scalar product to speak about vectors and co-vectors, but you need to have them to speak of bra-s and ket-s.

That's interesting you bring that up. There seem to be two different concepts or definitions of co-vectors in the literature, depending on whether you get there using the exterior algebra and differential forms or multilinear forms and a metric (with the metric as the defining bijection for the dual). For the diff-forms approach you only need the metric when you introduce the hodge dual and not the co-vectors.

I think I understand this all pretty well, but I never found the different definitions very intuitive and the differences rather confusing. But then again, I'm only a theoretical physicist and not a real mathematician.

Any thoughts on that?

Cheers,

Jazz

- #8

- 13,052

- 599

- #9

- 239

- 46

So what's your most general definition of a co-vector?

Cheers,

Jazz

- #10

- 13,052

- 599

- #11

rubi

Science Advisor

- 847

- 348

In the case of manifolds, you automatically have the tangent spaces ##T_p M## at every point and since they are topological vector spaces (all finite-dimensional vector spaces have this property), you can form their dual ##T^*_p M##. If you have a metric, the tangent spaces are Hilbert spaces and you can use the Riesz isomorphism to identify tangent vectors with cotangent vectors.

Share: