1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Bragg Reflection?

  1. Feb 23, 2007 #1

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    An alkali halide is studied with the Debye-Scherrer technique and Cu [itex] K_{\alpha} [/itex] radiation. The Bragg angles for the first five lines (in degrees) are 10.83, 15.39, 18.99, 22.07, and 24.84. Calculate

    (a) The lattice parameter
    (b) The Miller indices for the planes producing the mentioned diffraction beams
    (c) The Miller index for the line(s) producing the largest allowable Bragg angle.

    Added in by the prof as an afterthought:

    [tex] \textrm{Take} \ \ \lambda[\textrm{Cu} \ K_{\alpha}] = 1.542 \ \ \textrm{\AA} [/tex]

    2. Relevant equations

    As far as I can tell they are:

    The Bragg condition for diffraction:

    [tex] 2d \sin \theta = n \lambda [/tex]

    A previously derived result that for a cubic lattice with lattice constant a, the spacing between successive (hkl) places is given by:

    [tex] d = a[h^2 + k^2 + l^2]^{-\frac{1}{2}} [/tex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I'm pretty lost here. Is the lattice parameter (cubic unit cell dimension) 'a' supposed to be arrived at somehow independently of the diffaction data?

    The Debye-Scherrer technique was never discussed in class. I looked it up and discovered that rather than varying the angle of incidence of a single beam on the crystal face, the beam is shone at a sample of many ground up crystals of random orientations in order to cover all incidence angles simultaneously (or something like that!) This leads me to wonder how you can tell which line is due to which angle, but I'm not going to look into it further. I think the whole idea is that the specific experimental technique used to produce the data is not relevant to the problem, which is why the prof didn't have a problem introducing terminology he hadn't defined (although he doesn't have a problem doing that anyway! :grumpy: )

    As for part b, the logical thing to do would seem to be to try and use the data to calculate n. But how is that done without knowing what d is? Which requires knowing a...

    I don't even understand how x-ray diffraction works. Is each line associated with a different angle (one of the five given)? If so, does each line correspond to reflection off the *same* atomic plane, but just a different incidence angles? Or is each line produced by reflections from different planes with different Miller indices!
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 23, 2007 #2

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Hey everyone,

    Don't worry about it. It's too late. The prof has handed out solutions though. I can post them here if anyone else is curious.

    Thanks.
     
  4. Sep 30, 2010 #3
    could you please post the solution!!
    Thanks
     
  5. Sep 30, 2010 #4

    cepheid

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No, I can't, because this thread is three years old!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Bragg Reflection?
  1. Braggs reflections (Replies: 1)

Loading...