Brake or swerve?

  • Thread starter staz87
  • Start date
  • #1
11
0
My professor went over this but forgot how he explained it.

Basically he said if you're in a car and have a wall stretching for miles ahead of you what would be better to do brake or swerve?

He wrote something down about how cornering takes place at a rate of something and that braking takes place at another rate. He said braking was faster.

Can anyone show me this again?

Thanks yall!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
2,006
5
In general it is always better to break (since in real life swerving inevitably ends in hitting something else instead anyway, and at a much higher speed, plus it's unpredictable to other drivers), hence you should just drive to maintain safe breaking distance from all potential hazards.

As the for mechanics problem, if we presume the tires can only apply a certain force (before skidding), then by directing that force exactly opposite to the car's momentum (breaking) the car will minimise the velocity at which it hits the wall. Swerving means directing that force at 45 degrees, making the anti-forward component less. (Cute problem, although its logic applies only to wide targets.)
 
Last edited:
  • #3

Related Threads on Brake or swerve?

Replies
15
Views
964
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
271
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
777
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
32
Views
518
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
252
Top