Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Bremstrahlung radiation - a stupid question

  1. Apr 29, 2008 #1
    why is it that the feynman diagram illustrating Bremstrahlung radiation has three vertices; basically an electron decays into a)a photon which recoils the nucleus and b)a virtual electron WHICH THEN decays into another photon and an electron of lower energy.

    why can't the original electron just decay into another REAL electron (plus the photon), like in Compton scattering?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 29, 2008 #2
    It can do that, but that's called Rutherford scattering, not bremsstrahlung.

    By definition, bremsstrahlung involves 2 processes: an electron decelerates due to an external field, and it emits real radiation.
     
  4. Apr 30, 2008 #3

    nrqed

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Phlogistonian gave the answer. But let me add that it's confusing when you use the term "decay" here. Decay is used when a particle transforms into other particles. Here the electron does not "decay" since it's still there after. The way people would normally describe what happens is that the electron "emits" or "radiates" a photon. So the process you are describing is that an electron emits a photon absorbs by the nucleus and then a second, real photon. If no real photon is emitted than this is is just Rutherford scattering, not Bremsthrahlung, as Phlogistonian said.
     
  5. Apr 30, 2008 #4
    thanks Phlogistonian and nrqed...

    (and yes ofcourse I was misusing the word 'decay' in this context)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Bremstrahlung radiation - a stupid question
  1. Stupid nuetrinos (Replies: 3)

  2. Cherenkov radiation (Replies: 1)

Loading...