British scientists is convinced it has found proof of alien life

In summary, a team of British scientists claims to have found proof of alien life after harvesting strange particles from the edge of space. However, their findings were published in a non-peer reviewed journal with a questionable reputation for promoting fringe and speculative viewpoints on astrobiology, astrophysics, and quantum physics. Many experts in the scientific community have dismissed their claims as flawed and lacking evidence. It is important for universities to closely monitor the quality of research being published from their departments, especially during times of budget cuts. Additionally, there is already evidence of high altitude bacteria on Earth, making the idea that these organisms must have come from space unfounded.
  • #1
Yosty22
185
4
I stumbled upon this article and was wondering what others think of it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/s...o-have-found-proof-of-alien-life-8826690.html

A team of British scientists is convinced it has found proof of alien life, after it harvested strange particles from the edge of space.

The scientists sent a balloon 27km into the stratosphere, which came back carrying small biological organisms which they believe can only have originated from space.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The "Journal of Cosmology" is not a recognized journal by Thompson Reuters Master Journal list, so it is not accepted by PF. This is where they posted their unsubstantiated claims.

As the article you posted even states
the Journal of Cosmology has had its reputation called into question more than once by other members of the scientific community.

More on it's crackpottery

Reliability

The quality of peer review at the journal has been questioned.[2][3][4][5][6][7] The journal has also been accused of promoting fringe viewpoints and speculative viewpoints on astrobiology, astrophysics, and quantum physics. Skeptical blogger and biologist PZ Myers said of the journal "... it isn't a real science journal at all, but is the... website of a small group... obsessed with the idea of Hoyle and Wickramasinghe that life originated in outer space and simply rained down on Earth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Cosmology#Reliability

I think we can dismiss the findings claimed in the article for now.
 
  • #3
This is nonsense, the university of Sheffield should take a strong look at its departments. At a time when universities across the country are struggling with budget cuts poor quality research like this published in a non-peer reviewed journal (the journal of cosmology is a crackpot, non credible website) is unacceptable.

Their ideas are riddled with errors but the biggest one is that high altitude organisms must come from space. We have known about high altitude bacteria for a long time, here's a far more reputable reputable article on the subject
http://www.nature.com/news/high-flying-bacteria-spark-interest-in-possible-climate-effects-1.12310
 
  • #4
My favorite part is that they say there is no known mechanism by which these organisms could have achieved that height from earth, so they must have blasted off from another planet
 
  • #5
The part about comets being aquatic environments was the icing on the cake for me.
 

1. What evidence do British scientists have to support their claim of finding proof of alien life?

British scientists have discovered a unique molecule called phosphine in the atmosphere of Venus. This molecule, which is typically produced by living organisms, has no known other source on the planet, leading scientists to believe that it could be a sign of microbial life on Venus.

2. How did the British scientists make this discovery?

The discovery was made using powerful telescopes located in Hawaii and Chile. The scientists observed the absorption of light at a specific wavelength, indicating the presence of phosphine in the Venusian atmosphere.

3. Is this the first time evidence of alien life has been found?

No, this is not the first time evidence of alien life has been found. In 1976, NASA's Viking landers detected chemical reactions in Martian soil that could potentially be attributed to microbial life. However, this finding was later dismissed as inconclusive.

4. What does this discovery mean for the search for extraterrestrial life?

This discovery has significant implications for the search for extraterrestrial life. It suggests that our current understanding of where and how life can exist may be too narrow, and opens up the possibility of finding life in unexpected places.

5. What is the next step for the British scientists in regards to this discovery?

The next step for the British scientists is to conduct further research and investigations to confirm their findings and rule out any other possible explanations. This could include sending a spacecraft to Venus to collect samples or using more powerful telescopes to gather additional data.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
11
Views
25K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
18
Views
6K
Back
Top