Broken link in LaTeXhelp

[BvU]

TL;DR Summary

list of supported commands seems to have moved

For MathJax documentation, see the https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/mathjax.html. In particular, you can find a complete list of LaTeX commands supported by MathJax https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/tex.html#supported-latex-commands

Last link points to https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/tex.html#supported-latex-commands which is no more

I think it's https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/input/tex/macros/index.html now


However, there is far too much in there that doesn't work in the PF version, so maybe there is another link for our subset ?

$\$

 

[fresh_42]

I think it should be
http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/
behind the first mention of "MathJax" in

LaTeX is the standard language used by mathematicians, physicists, etc. for typesetting mathematical expressions. PF uses https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/mathjax.html, a Javascript-based engine, to process LaTeX code in posts and render it in the way you would see it in a textbook.

and an additional sentence with your link
https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/input/tex/macros/index.html
should be added in order to point to the supported TeX commands. Maybe with the additional link
https://www.onemathematicalcat.org/MathJaxDocumentation/TeXSyntax.htm
found there.

 

[pbuk]

I think it's https://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/input/tex/macros/index.html now

Yes.

However, there is far too much in there that doesn't work in the PF version, so maybe there is another link for our subset ?

Note the comment on that page "If the package name is in italics, then the package is not autoloaded by the autoload extension." Like most sites that use MathJax I believe PF only supports autoloaded packages so the list you seek is the list excluding rows with italics in the second column.

 

[fresh_42]

Paging @Mark44 and @Greg Bernhardt since I have no access to the source code.

 

[Mark44]

We moderators used to have access to PF auxiliary files like the LaTeX tutorial, but AFAIK we don't have access any longer. This is something that @Greg Bernhardt would need to address.

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

On it, thanks!