Can I Design a Non-Chemical Battery or Firestarter Using Basic Components?

  • Thread starter kithwrike
  • Start date
In summary, it is possible to design a non-chemical battery or firestarter using basic components. By utilizing materials such as copper, zinc, and saltwater, a simple battery can be created without the use of harmful chemicals. Similarly, a firestarter can be made using materials such as steel wool and a battery, or a magnesium rod and a flint. These alternatives to chemical-based batteries and firestarters offer a more environmentally friendly and sustainable option. However, it is important to properly research and follow safety precautions when creating and using these DIY solutions.
  • #1
kithwrike
3
0
So, yeah, I'm supposed to post something like this.

Design is a mental activity I do a lot of--even if I'm pretty confident that I am never going to even try to execute a design. And I mean, by design I'm talking about anything possible that can conceived of as a set of choices. I believe the existence of the internet is making many (very many) customary ways of doing things less promising strategies than people were accustomed to. There's no such thing as a sure bet or safe money in economics, but many things could be relied on to a high degree of probability. And everywhere I look I see people relying on things that make little sense now and are probably going to make even less sense soon. A lot of the things I'm talking about, I don't think very many people think of these things as changing, like, ever.

And so in that context, when I think there might be a problem, I try to design an alternative that might work. And so I'm basically assembling components that I believe exist. I find these components by considering even something like "Early Viking Age Culture" as a set of components that I can disassemble. So yeah, even things that develop organically I consider as a design. The organic things are actually the best things to apply this approach to, be cause anything that can be said to have "evolved" is probably very,very efficiently using many of the components involved. I don't think of evolution as something that makes mistakes.

What I haven't been doing enough is learning the details of how these individual components work. So while, on a very abstract level, I know what a "battery" is, I was thinking the other day if it was possible to make non-chemical batteries and suddenly I realized that my concept of what a "battery" is is something I can't really rely on if a "battery" is part of the complicated part of the design. I was wondering also the other day if I could make a firestarter from a very thin wire and a watch battery. You'd pack tinder around the wire, engage the battery, and while the current was heating up the wire, you would set the whole assembly under some kindling. If the wire could get hot enough to light the tinder, success!

But then I realized I really have no idea if a watch battery puts out enough power to do that. And I consider it as "power" ie I know nothing about volts and amperes other than having heard of them.

So that's why I'm here. I'll try not to be too annoying.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!
 

Similar threads

  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
46
Replies
2
Views
67
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
753
  • Electromagnetism
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
815
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
979
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top