Build a Steel Trebuchet to Throw 20-30lbs 300ft+

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Arlof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Trebuchet
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a steel trebuchet designed to launch a 20 to 30-pound object over a distance of 300 feet or more. Participants explore various technical aspects, including arm lengths, weight ratios, and safety considerations, while addressing the challenges of achieving the desired performance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to achieve a launch speed of around 600 meters per second, the long arm must be approximately 2.5 times the length of the short arm, considering a 1000-pound counterweight.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the danger of building such a machine, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of mechanical losses and angular momentum.
  • Some participants propose that a smaller model could be beneficial for testing and optimization before constructing the full-sized trebuchet.
  • There is a mention of needing an 80:1 counterweight to projectile ratio for effective performance, questioning the feasibility of the current design with an 8-foot height.
  • A participant shares a link to a trebuchet simulation program that could help in calculating theoretical distances based on various parameters, although they note that the math involved is complex.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the scaling of trebuchets, indicating that smaller models may not accurately predict the performance of larger designs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement on the need for careful design and testing, but there is no consensus on the specific parameters or feasibility of the proposed trebuchet. Multiple competing views on the effectiveness of scaling and model testing remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to scaling effects, the complexity of the underlying physics, and the potential dangers associated with building large trebuchets. There are also references to the need for precise calculations and the impact of mechanical losses.

Arlof
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am building a Trebuchet That is made out of steel and is about 8 feet tall, with a 1000 pound weight. here is what i need to know.

I want it to throw a 20 to 30 pound object 300 ft or more.

What Does the length of the arm with the weight and the length of the trowing arm have to be. To achieve this.

Its kinda urgent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Laying siege to your neighbours? :biggrin:
Sorry, I can't help with the math.
 
WARNING: Any machine capable of that is *very* dangerous.

Now, assuming we can ignore air and the ground is flat, and we're launching for 300 meters ('cause I know all the constants in metric).

You're going want a launch speed around 600 meters per second. Ignoring the mechanical losses that figures to a drop of around 8 meters (more than 24 feet) for the 1000 lb weight - so it's out of your reach.

In addition, you'll need the long arm to be about 2.5 times as long as the short arm for that projectile. So for the 1000 - 20 ratio, the structure would start getting very large.

In practice the angular moment of the arm is also an issue.

http://www.eskimo.com/~verne/catapult.htm

For peak efficiency, the weight should be free swinging (common) and the trebuchet should be on rollers (uncommon).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Arlof said:
I am building a Trebuchet That is made out of steel and is about 8 feet tall, with a 1000 pound weight. here is what i need to know.

I want it to throw a 20 to 30 pound object 300 ft or more.

What Does the length of the arm with the weight and the length of the trowing arm have to be. To achieve this.

Its kinda urgent.
Have a look at http://physics.ucsc.edu/~mdcovin/homepage/physfinal3.doc" .

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NateTG said:
WARNING: Any machine capable of that is *very* dangerous.

Now, assuming we can ignore air and the ground is flat, and we're launching for 300 meters ('cause I know all the constants in metric).

You're going want a launch speed around 600 meters per second. Ignoring the mechanical losses that figures to a drop of around 8 meters (more than 24 feet) for the 1000 lb weight - so it's out of your reach.

In addition, you'll need the long arm to be about 2.5 times as long as the short arm for that projectile. So for the 1000 - 20 ratio, the structure would start getting very large.

In practice the angular moment of the arm is also an issue.

http://www.eskimo.com/~verne/catapult.htm

For peak efficiency, the weight should be free swinging (common) and the trebuchet should be on rollers (uncommon).


Well how far could we throw a 20 pound projectile with the height we already have? How long do the 2 arms have to be on the fulcrum?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From experience you usually need at least a 80 - 1 CW projectile ratio. And for 20-30 pounds 8 feet isn't very big. Why don't you try throwing something smaller?
 
i don't have an answer. but may i know why you are building this
is it a physics project or something
 
Arlof said:
Well how far could we throw a 20 pound projectile with the height we already have? How long do the 2 arms have to be on the fulcrum?

The easiest way to find out is to go to the firing range.
 
It helps first to build a small model before going for the full blown one, I did that and it helped we make multiple improvements.
Here you can see my treb (for physics project and for fun) fireing:
http://www.geocities.com/daniel_i_l/treb3.mpeg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Nice vid! I'll bet that sparked your creativity for optimization.
 
  • #11
I built a very small trebuchet during 9th grade in school; and I browsed the internet for information. I found a lot of sites dealing with trebuchet-physics. [I don't have the adresses, but a quick google search would give you the wanted results].

Beware though that a model in a much smaller scale wouldn't work as a test-machine for your larger one as many parameters will change. Instead to a medium-sized model (if you're even going to make a model)
 
  • #12
I agree with myspip...trebuchets don't "scale up" like you think they should.
However, there is a pretty nifty trebuchet simulation program out there for free - you specify several parameters (weight of the counterweight, arm lengths, sling lengths, mass of projectile, etc.) and it will calculate the theoretical distance the projectile will travel. The math is not trivial for this system (several coupled differential equations), but I used this simulation program when building a trebuchet in college, and it was fairly accurate - albeit at the small scale we were using (we were limited to a 2ft x 2ft x 2ft cube, and threw golf balls approx 125 ft).
Try googling it (sorry no link).
Hope this helps...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K