Bush in Baghdad - 2 Shoes, Size 10

  • News
  • Thread starter LowlyPion
  • Start date
In summary, the Iraqi journalist threw two shoes at President deselect George Bush at a news conference today. He adroitly ducked the shoes like he has press conference questions for years now. The remarkable thing to me was, where was the Secret Service? The journalist threw one and then had plenty of time to get off the second. No one threw their body in the path of either. Maybe he just wanted them polished. No one threw their body in the path of either.Perhaps they were really smelly? Is that where we have come as a society? Where political assassinations are done via shoes? Imagine if in the Kennedy assassination instead of getting shot twice he got two shoes thrown at him really hard. Things would have been a lot
  • #71
schroder said:
I think this incident will be THE defining moment for the Bush legacy and the Iraq war, similar to way the image of the helicopters taking off from the roof of the US Embassy in Saigon back in 1975 defined the Vietnam war. The image of GWB ducking from shoes thrown by an irate Iraqi just sums it all up: failure.

Too bad Old Quick-Trigger Cheney wasn't there to get some of the love as well.
A picture of him ducking behind Bush ... ? priceless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
schroder said:
I think this incident will be THE defining moment for the Bush legacy and the Iraq war, similar to way the image of the helicopters taking off from the roof of the US Embassy in Saigon back in 1975 defined the Vietnam war. The image of GWB ducking from shoes thrown by an irate Iraqi just sums it all up: failure.

Yes, it will.

I thought the incident was funny from the context of American culture, but I agree with Cyrus that the incident was a lot larger in Iraqi culture.

It was a huge insult and not the first: Shoe throwing

One insult that many Americans would find puzzling was Saddam Hussein putting a mural of Bush 41 right inside the front door of Baghdad's Rashid Hotel. The insult lie in the fact that no visiting VIPs could avoid stepping on Bush 41's face when they entered the hotel.

The shoe insult is why so many Bush 43 pictures in Iraq have shoes nailed to them - something else Americans would find so puzzling the news media doesn't bother to show them.

Middle Easterners probably find it a little puzzling that the news stations keep showing replays over and over, just because it's so entertaining to watch Bush ducking shoes. I expect an internet game based on this within days - similar in spirit to the internet game, "Slap Hillary", that was going around years ago.
 
  • #73
I still think the Iraq War is going to be the silver lining of Bush's administration. I can see it prospering as a democratic nation within the next decade.
 
  • #74
LowlyPion said:
...What in the h-e-double hockey sticks is he there for in the first place? The economy is melting down domestically and Dubya is jetting to Iraq? ...
Because there are ~130,000 US troops there and he's the commander in chief; it means a great deal to those guys. For the same reason he went to Afghanistan the next day.
 
  • #75
mheslep said:
Because there are ~130,000 US troops there and he's the commander in chief; it means a great deal to those guys. For the same reason he went to Afghanistan the next day.

Yeah, another one of those Mission Accomplished moments that Rove likes to stage for the guy?

Sure he's Commander and Chief and if he really wanted to see the troops he didn't need a Press Conference to do it either. I'd say this is a man on Legacy Tour right now. Barney Frank is right. We really are a President short at the moment. And in light of circumstances and the hang over the country is saddled with now I think it would surely have been better if we hadn't had this one at all.

Apparently he's moving to the Dallas area next month so he can be close to his library planning at SMU. This is his idea of community service after leaving office?
 
  • #76
Salon said:
Monday, Dec. 15, 2008 11:50 EST
Shoe-thrower's brother steps up

Maythem al-Zaidi, the 28-year-old brother of Muntader al-Zaidi, the man who threw his shoes at President Bush during a Sunday press conference, has spoken up to explain and defend his brother's actions. From the New York Times:

Hitting someone with a shoe is a particularly strong rebuke in Iraqi culture. Although the president was uninjured, the incident overshadowed media coverage of the trip in the Arab world. And it has transformed Muntader al-Zaidi into a symbolic figure in the debate about the American military’s presence in Iraq.

Maythem al-Zaidi said his brother had not planned to throw his shoes prior to Sunday. “He was provoked when Mr. Bush said [during the news conference] this is his farewell gift to the Iraqi people,” he said. A colleague of Muntader al-Zaidi’s at al-Baghdadiya satellite channel, however, said the correspondent had been “planning for this from a long time. He told me that his dream is to hit Bush with shoes,” said the man, who would not give his name.

Muntader al-Zaidi appears to have a long-standing dislike of the United States presence in Iraq. He used to finish his reports by saying he was in "the occupied Baghdad." His brother said that he hates the occupation so strongly that he canceled his wedding, saying: "I will marry when the occupation is over . . ."

Muntader al-Zaidi was the head of the student union under Saddam Hussein and he earned a diploma as a mechanic from a technical institute before becoming a journalist. He worked at al-Qasim al-Mushterek newspaper, an Iraqi daily founded after the 2003 invasion, then he joined al-Diyar satellite channel, an Iraqi channel founded after the war. Two years later, he joined al-Baghdadiya satellite channel, another Iraqi channel, which is based in Cairo.

Maythem al-Zaidi contacted a judge to ask him if what his brother did is a crime under Iraqi law. The judge told him that he might serve two years in prison or pay a fine for insulting a president of foreign country unless Mr. Bush withdrew the case. “If they manage to imprison Muntader, there are millions of him all over Iraq and the Arab world,” Maythem al-Zaidi said.

Maythem al-Zaidi said has been contacted from about 100 Iraqi and foreign lawyers offering their services free of charge — including Saddam Hussein’s lawyer Khalil al-Dulaymi. When asked if he will accept Mr. al-Dulaymi’s services, he replied, “Why not, we are all Iraqis.”
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/?last_story=/politics/war_room/2008/12/15/shoe_brother/
 
  • #77
Hello there,

I was surprised this morning when I read this in the newspaper and I couldn't help myself from laughing. The act is very symbolic rather than an assault; he didn't want to hurt him, he wanted to express his deepest disrespect and disgust for Bush. I believe that after what Bush did to Iraq and the Iraqi people, give anyone a chance of throwing a shoe at him (or do anything to express his feelings) & put aside the fear of torture and death, he would not hesitate to do it.
Nonetheless, I don't support this act but I sympathize with the reporter.
I would also like to say that when the reporter did this, he certainly meant Bush.
 
  • #78
Cyrus said:
No, Art. A journalist does not go around trying to harm heads of state. There is no excuse for what he did. NONE. NOT ONE. NONE.

I think that when a person sees streets full of their countrymen's blood, guts and body parts regularly for several years, they would lose respect for the sanctity of the leader of the country that perpetrated such gore.

"excuse"? I don't think anyone is saying or implying that the shoe-thrower should be excused of any reasonable consequences of his actions such as losing his job, being condemned by bush supporters, being put on the terrorist watch list, etc. However, some people are saying that the consequences won't make the person regret his actions


Cyrus said:
Did Bush personally tell you this?

Folks: Please stop making statements as if they were matter of fact.

Generally the only "facts" in politics are history. For example it isn't a fact that if a terrorist set off a nuke in down town New York that it would change American foreign policy, but claiming that it isn't a "matter of fact" won't do much to convince people it wouldn't happen.

Cyrus said:
As much as I don't like Bush, no one. NO ONE, is allowed to assult the president. Under no circumstancse. Ever.

What does this have to do with anything? Are you implying that there should be some kind of repercussions for assaulting Bush because of his special status as president?
 
  • #79
BobG said:
Middle Easterners probably find it a little puzzling that the news stations keep showing replays over and over, just because it's so entertaining to watch Bush ducking shoes. I expect an internet game based on this within days - similar in spirit to the internet game, "Slap Hillary", that was going around years ago.

Well, this is a pretty http://www.t-enterprise.co.uk/flashgame/playgame.aspx?id=bushbootcamp [Broken]. They obviously adapted it from something else. You try to shoot the shoes before they hit Pres Bush. You should try to avoid shooting Pres Bush, too.

This is one has no challenge to it at all. Bush does have a dumb expression, though.http://www.jdr.ma/game/index.html [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #80
cristo said:
What do you mean "work in some kind of pardon"? I wasn't aware that this incident happened on US soil, where the president has power.

that's why i used the weasel words "some kind". however, note that "sovereign" is also a weasel word. native american nations are also sovereign, but we don't let them grow hemp on their own land. neither do we yet let the iraqis do anything they want. we put up a public front, but it's just PR. they are occupied territory, just like the japanese were, and we'll hand back full control in good time.
 
  • #81
Cyrus said:
You could never get such a thing passed. What "crimes" were comitted?
Are you going to argue he lied by taking us into war?
Yep, I would. I believe lies were told and actions were taken that should not have happened.
A full inquest would satisfy me.
Could be shoes would not be that last thing thrown at him.
 
  • #82
Alfi said:
Yep, I would. I believe lies were told and actions were taken that should not have happened.
A full inquest would satisfy me.
Could be shoes would not be that last thing thrown at him.

Stick to the topic being discussed here. This comment is massively offtopic, and continuing to discuss it will inevitably result in this thread being locked.
 
  • #83
It would have been funny if Bush threw his own shoes back at the guy.
 
  • #84
WarPhalange said:
It would have been funny if Bush threw his own shoes back at the guy.

I'm trying to think of a president that would do that... maybe Reagan would have?
 
  • #85
drankin said:
I'm trying to think of a president that would do that... maybe Reagan would have?

Likely Andrew Jackson would have waded into the audience and beat the guy over the head with the shoes he threw.

There was an assassination attempt against Jackson and the gun misfired and he went after the man and had to be restrained. But then again he survived a few duels. Not many modern Presidents deal with issues of honor in that way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson#Attack_and_assassination_attempt
 
  • #86
I wonder what kind of shoes they were. A pair of Nunn Bush Lincolns would have been a good choice.

From the reviews, it takes a while to break them in, but they last forever and even women like them.
 
  • #87
LowlyPion said:
Barney Frank is right.

L.O.L.

Apparently he's moving to the Dallas area next month so he can be close to his library planning at SMU. This is his idea of community service after leaving office?

I'm so tired of all you cry babies spouting off about how HORRIBLE dubya is at every aspect of reality and taking any chance to anonymously laugh out loud at him and crap on everything he's done, doing, or will do. What would you rather he do? The POTUS is pretty much the highest form of community service any given citizen could perform.

I'm just pointing this out so before you shoot back at me with something like "YEAH, WELL HE DID A BAD JOB THO.", just save it... this isn't the topic and that topic's been done to death. Everywhere.

I'm trying to think of a president that would do that... maybe Reagan would have?

Totally. Reagan was the man.
 
  • #88
I've seen reports that the shoe-thrower is not in the best shape. broken ribs and such. Any ideas on whether he received such treatment from the US or Iraqui forces?
 
  • #89
seycyrus said:
I've seen reports that the shoe-thrower is not in the best shape. broken ribs and such. Any ideas on whether he received such treatment from the US or Iraqui forces?

He left a trail of blood behind as he was dragged out of the room, so it's possible all (or at least most) of the injuries were sustained while he was being subdued. Whether it was Secret Service or Iraqi security that subdued him, I couldn't tell you.

A little extreme for throwing a shoe, but security isn't going to be too worried about an attacker's health when they're protecting a head of state from a threat (possible assassination would probably be an exaggeration in this instance, but an attack is an attack).
 
  • #90
Could someone link to reports of the guy getting beat up and leaving a trail of blood?

I expect it would be the Iraqi security, if anyone. It would make the president look like a thug if the secret service beat someone to a pulp just as a matter of spite.
 
  • #91
BBC said:
Shoe thrower 'beaten in custody'
Shoes thrown at George Bush
Muntadar al-Zaidi was wrestled to the ground and dragged away

The brother of the Iraqi journalist who threw his shoes at US President George W Bush has said that the reporter has been beaten in custody.

Muntadar al-Zaidi has suffered a broken hand, broken ribs and internal bleeding, as well as an eye injury, his older brother, Dargham, told the BBC.

Mr Zaidi threw his shoes at Mr Bush at a news conference, calling him "a dog".

The head of Iraq's journalists' union told the BBC that officials told him Mr Zaidi was being treated well.

The union head, Mouyyad al-Lami, said he hoped to visit his colleague later.

An Iraqi official said Mr Zaidi had been handed over to the judicial authorities, according to the AFP news agency.

Earlier, Dargham al-Zaidi told the BBC's Caroline Wyatt in Baghdad he believed his brother had been taken to a US military hospital in the Iraqi capital.

A second day of rallies in support of Mr Zaidi have been held across Iraq, calling for his release.

Meanwhile, offers to buy the shoes are being made around the Arab world, reports say.

Hero figure

Mr Zaidi told our correspondent that despite offers from many lawyers his brother has not been given access to a legal representative since being arrested by forces under the command of Mowaffaq al-Rubaie, Iraq's national security adviser.

We hope the government and judiciary consider his release because he has a family and he is still young
Mouyyad al-Lami, Iraqi journalists' union

The Iraqi authorities have said the 28-year-old will be prosecuted under Iraqi law, although it is not yet clear what the charges might be.

Iraqi lawyers have speculated that he could face charges of insulting a foreign leader and the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nouri Maliki, who was standing next to President Bush during the incident. The offence carries a maximum penalty of two years in jail.

Our correspondent says that the previously little-known journalist from the private Cairo-based al-Baghdadia TV has become a hero to many, not just in Iraq but across the Arab world, for what many saw as a fitting send-off for a deeply unpopular US president.

As he flung the shoes, Mr Zaidi shouted: "This is a goodbye kiss from the Iraqi people, dog."

Dargham al-Zaidi told the BBC that his brother deliberately bought Iraqi-made shoes, which were dark brown with laces. They were bought from a shop on al-Khyam street, a well-known shopping street in central Baghdad.

However, not everyone in Iraq has been supportive of the journalist's action.

Speaking earlier in Baghdad, Mouyyad al-Lami described Mr Zaidi's action as "strange and unprofessional", but urged Mr Maliki to show compassion.

"Even if he has made a mistake, the government and the judiciary are broad-minded and we hope they consider his release because he has a family and he is still young," he told the Associated Press news agency.

"We hope this case ends before going to court."

Abducted by insurgents

The shoes themselves are said to have attracted bids from around the Arab world.

According to unconfirmed newspaper reports, the former coach of the Iraqi national football team, Adnan Hamad, has offered $100,000 (£65,000) for the shoes, while a Saudi citizen has apparently offered $10m (£6.5m).

Muntadar al-Zaidi (file image)
Mr Zaidi said his actions were for Iraqi widows and orphans
The daughter of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, Aicha, said her charity would honour the reporter with a medal of courage, saying his action was a "victory for human rights".

The charity called on the media to support Mr Zaidi and put pressure on the Iraqi government to free him.

Mr Zaidi, who lives in Baghdad, has worked for al-Baghdadia for three years.

Muzhir al-Khafaji, programming director for the channel, described him as a "proud Arab and an open-minded man".

He said that Mr Zaidi was a graduate of communications from Baghdad University.

"He has no ties with the former regime. His family was arrested under Saddam's regime," he said.

Mr Zaidi has previously been abducted by insurgents and held twice for questioning by US forces in Iraq.

In November 2007 he was kidnapped by a gang on his way to work in central Baghdad and released three days later without a ransom.

He said at the time that the kidnappers had beaten him until he lost consciousness, and used his necktie to blindfold him.

Mr Zaidi never learned the identity of his kidnappers, who questioned him about his work before letting him go.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7785338.stm
 
  • #92
LowlyPion said:

..Our correspondent says that the previously little-known journalist from the private Cairo-based al-Baghdadia TV has become a hero to many, not just in Iraq but across the Arab world, for what many saw as a fitting send-off for a deeply unpopular US president.
Sigh. I used to be merely tired of these claims, though now its evolved into amusement, from some 'correspondent' who claims he can survey the entire world, and relay the opinion of the 'many', within 24 hours of an event from their barstool in the local press watering hole.
 
  • #93
Was the guy wearing a Che Guevara shirt as well? Pretty original to show disdain for Bush these days.

Bush should make sure the journalist doesn't get arrested or charged and should send him a bottle of champagne with a little note saying something along the lines of, "Enjoy exercising your new acquired freedoms. ps: Your throw sucks. Loser! Dubya out"
 
  • #94
DropGems said:
Was the guy wearing a Che Guevara shirt as well? Pretty original to show disdain for Bush these days.

Pretty original to show disdain for Hitler these days as well. Gee, I wonder why?

Bush should make sure the journalist doesn't get arrested or charged and should send him a bottle of champagne with a little note saying something along the lines of, "Enjoy exercising your new acquired freedoms. ps: Your throw sucks. Loser! Dubya out"

He could send the man a new pair of shoes with his signature on them.
 
  • #95
tchitt said:
The POTUS is pretty much the highest form of community service any given citizen could perform.

Someone needs to tell him that. With all of his "executive privilege" and "I don't care what people think about the war, I think it's right." Not much community service going on there.

Totally. Reagan was the man.

:rolleyes:

BobG said:
A little extreme for throwing a shoe, but security isn't going to be too worried about an attacker's health when they're protecting a head of state from a threat (possible assassination would probably be an exaggeration in this instance, but an attack is an attack).

There was no telling if this was just some crazy guy or the start of an actual attack. The SS should get 10 lashes for taking that long to respond, though. Nobody even jumped in front of the president to take a shoe to the chest for him.
 
  • #96
WarPhalange said:
Pretty original to show disdain for Hitler these days as well. Gee, I wonder why?

Well, no sane person would compare Bush to Hitler.
 
  • #97
WarPhalange said:
There was no telling if this was just some crazy guy or the start of an actual attack. The SS should get 10 lashes for taking that long to respond, though. Nobody even jumped in front of the president to take a shoe to the chest for him.

Yes, they did. Watch the video. After the second shoe was thrown, the Secret Service guy is right there. If the reporter had three feet, the Secret Service guy would have been all over it and would have taken one for the Prez.

Pretty embarrassing for the Secret Service. Secret Service Defends Shoe Response

I would expect that changes will be made. From now on, all reporters at press conferences will have to remove their shoes. I imagine a side effect is that reporters will ask much easier questions. It's tough to ask hardball questions when you're barefoot, plus who wants to discover that building staff has accidently spilled their Starbucks in your shoe; or the house cat has found a new litterbox. Going shoeless creates a whole new dynamic for reporters.

Whatever happens, this definitely tops Nikita Kruschev's shoe incident.
 
Last edited:
  • #98
BobG said:
Yes, they did. Watch the video. After the second (emphasis mine) shoe was thrown, the Secret Service guy is right there. If the reporter had three feet, the Secret Service guy would have been all over it and would have taken one for the Prez.

Not good enough. All it takes is one shoe to kill someone. They need to watch more "24" as part of the SS training.

I would expect that changes will be made. From now on, all reporters at press conferences will have to remove their shoes. I imagine a side effect is that reporters will ask much easier questions. It's tough to ask hardball questions when you're barefoot, plus who wants to discover that building staff has accidently spilled their Starbucks in your shoe; or the house cat has found a new litterbox. Going shoeless creates a whole new dynamic for reporters.

Going shoeless is a bit barbaric. I expect that reporters will have to store their shoes in lockers and be given out ultra-light foam flip-flops that cannot fly past 1m without being stopped by air resistance. This will probably go for all White House staff, as well.

seycyrus said:
Well, no sane person would compare Bush to Hitler.

Irrelevant. My point was sometimes people are hated because they deserve to be hated.

EDIT:

I'd also like to add:

iraqimage001.gif


One more if it's okay:

3112940773_07b4fd2613_o.jpg
 

Attachments

  • iraqimage001.gif
    iraqimage001.gif
    1.7 KB · Views: 334
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #99
BobG said:
Whatever happens, this definitely tops Nikita Kruschev's shoe incident.

No one offered any money for Khrushchev's shoe either.

I hope this guy is smart enough to demand his shoes when he is released.

If only he can get Bush to autograph the pair, they could be worth a lot more even.
 
  • #100
Does this mean we are only going to be able to take 4oz or smaller shoes on planes now?
 
  • #101
No, it means that when you have to take off your shoes at the airport, you won't get them back until you are at the other airport. Which of course also means you will end up with a missing shoe, two left shoes, someone else's shoes, damaged shoes, etc.

Heaven forbid they lose your shoes and you have to wait a few days to have them send them right to your door.
 
  • #102
If you wear flares will you need a concealed shoe permit?
Will there be a five day waiting period at shoe shops?
What about a ban on stilettos?
 
  • #103
Will shoe-kwon-do be outlawed? Will the masters of this art have to be licensed.
 
  • #104
People who wear socks with sandals will be shot on sight.
 
  • #105
Perhaps in the future the dress code for Press Conferences will be Crocs only for footwear?
 
<h2>1. What is the significance of the "2 Shoes" in the title?</h2><p>The "2 Shoes" refers to the two shoes that were thrown at former US President George W. Bush during a press conference in Baghdad, Iraq in 2008. The incident gained international attention and became a symbol of the Iraqi people's anger towards the US invasion and occupation of their country.</p><h2>2. Why is the size of the shoes mentioned?</h2><p>The size of the shoes, which were size 10, is significant because it was seen as a symbolic insult towards Bush. In Arab culture, throwing shoes at someone is considered a major insult and the size of the shoes is seen as a reflection of the person's stature and importance.</p><h2>3. Was anyone harmed during the incident?</h2><p>No, neither of the shoes thrown at Bush hit him. However, the shoe thrower, journalist Muntadhar al-Zaidi, was tackled and arrested by security forces and later sentenced to three years in prison for assaulting a foreign leader. He was released after nine months due to widespread protests and international pressure.</p><h2>4. Has this type of protest happened before?</h2><p>Yes, throwing shoes as a form of protest has a long history in many cultures, including the Middle East. In 2003, Iraqi protesters threw shoes at a statue of Saddam Hussein after the US-led invasion. In 2010, a man threw a shoe at Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao during a speech in Cambridge University. And in 2016, a protester threw a shoe at former US President Bill Clinton during a campaign rally.</p><h2>5. What impact did the "2 Shoes" incident have?</h2><p>The incident received widespread media coverage and sparked debates about the US involvement in Iraq and the treatment of Iraqi civilians. It also became a symbol of resistance and defiance for many Iraqis. The shoe thrower, Muntadhar al-Zaidi, gained celebrity status and was hailed as a hero by some. However, it also led to increased security measures and stricter restrictions for journalists in Iraq.</p>

1. What is the significance of the "2 Shoes" in the title?

The "2 Shoes" refers to the two shoes that were thrown at former US President George W. Bush during a press conference in Baghdad, Iraq in 2008. The incident gained international attention and became a symbol of the Iraqi people's anger towards the US invasion and occupation of their country.

2. Why is the size of the shoes mentioned?

The size of the shoes, which were size 10, is significant because it was seen as a symbolic insult towards Bush. In Arab culture, throwing shoes at someone is considered a major insult and the size of the shoes is seen as a reflection of the person's stature and importance.

3. Was anyone harmed during the incident?

No, neither of the shoes thrown at Bush hit him. However, the shoe thrower, journalist Muntadhar al-Zaidi, was tackled and arrested by security forces and later sentenced to three years in prison for assaulting a foreign leader. He was released after nine months due to widespread protests and international pressure.

4. Has this type of protest happened before?

Yes, throwing shoes as a form of protest has a long history in many cultures, including the Middle East. In 2003, Iraqi protesters threw shoes at a statue of Saddam Hussein after the US-led invasion. In 2010, a man threw a shoe at Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao during a speech in Cambridge University. And in 2016, a protester threw a shoe at former US President Bill Clinton during a campaign rally.

5. What impact did the "2 Shoes" incident have?

The incident received widespread media coverage and sparked debates about the US involvement in Iraq and the treatment of Iraqi civilians. It also became a symbol of resistance and defiance for many Iraqis. The shoe thrower, Muntadhar al-Zaidi, gained celebrity status and was hailed as a hero by some. However, it also led to increased security measures and stricter restrictions for journalists in Iraq.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
56
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
63
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top