1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Butterworth filters, help

  1. Mar 29, 2006 #1
    I want to design LPF using Butterworth transfer function & I have the following information
    Minimum gain attenuation Amin ,
    Maximum gain attenuation Amax ,
    Frequency of passband edge wp,
    Frequency of stopband edge ws,
    Amin,Amax,wp & ws can take any value

    (Using only Butterworth table for wp=1 & є=1)=====>which is the proplem Here :redface:
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 29, 2006 #2
    You have to calculuate the order of the Butterworth filter. Do you not have any equations or anything?
     
  4. Mar 30, 2006 #3
    Hi Corneo

    I don’t know if you understand me :-)

    For example if I have Amax=1dB ,Amin=25dB ,wp=20π rad/s ,ws=30π rad/s & dc gain=1 V/V

    I can find the Butterworth transfer function
    T(jw)= (1+є² (w/wp)^2n)^-½ with є=0.5088 N=9
    Then I can find the poles

    But I want to get the poles from Butterworth table for є=1 & wp=1rad/s

    n Factors of Polynomial T(s)
    1 (s + 1)
    2 s2 + 1.414s + 1
    3 (s + 1)(s2 + s + 1)
    4 (s2 + 0.7654s + 1)(s2 + 1.8478s + 1)
    5 (s + 1)(s2 + 0.6180s + 1)(s2 + 1.6180s + 1)
    6 (s2 + 0.5176s + 1)(s2 + 1.414s + 1)(s2 + 1.9318s + 1)
    7 (s + 1)(s2 + 0.4450s + 1)(s2 + 1.247s + 1)(s2 + 1.8022s + 1)
    8 (s2 + 0.3986s + 1)(s2 + 1.111s + 1)(s2 + 1.6630s + 1)(s2 + 1.9622s + 1)

    For this table we know that Amax =3dB for all poles. This is mean even if we scale T(jw)--->T(jw/wp) in order to reach to wp we will still need Amax to be 1dB.

    So how I can scale the transfer function & choose the order such that the new function will match my bounded value.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2006
  5. Mar 30, 2006 #4
    I'm not sure if I fully understood your problem here. Are you trying to find the final Butterworth transfer function for any arbitrary [itex]\omega_c[/itex], given that you have found the normalized Butterworth transfer function?
     
  6. Apr 7, 2006 #5

    rbj

    User Avatar

    is one of your problems that you don't have butterworth polynomial for N=9? do you need a closed form expression?

    also, what you should do with your spec is determine where the -3 dB frequency would be (assuming you did that right and correctly determined a 9th order is needed.
     
  7. Apr 10, 2006 #6

    BobG

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You're looking for the middle term in your polynomials?

    For your odds:

    Divide 180 by n. (let it equal t)

    Your first term is (s+1).
    For the second term, in polar coordinates:
    [tex](1 \angle{t})+(1 \angle {-t})[/tex]
    Third polynomial:
    [tex](1 \angle{2t}) + (1 \angle {-2t})[/tex]
    etc.

    For your fifth polynomial you have:
    (s+1)
    [tex](1 \angle {36}) + (1 \angle {-36}) = 1.6180[/tex]
    The polynomial is [tex]s^2 + 1.6180s + 1[/tex]
    [tex](1 \angle {72}) + (1 \angle {-72}) = .6180[/tex]
    The polynomial is [tex]s^2 + .6180s + 1[/tex]

    Making your final:
    [tex](s + 1) (s^2 + .6180s + 1) (s^2 + 1.6180s + 1)[/tex]

    etc.
    Edit: Technically, you should use 180-t everywhere I used t, but, as you can see.....

    Edit: Here's a graphical representation of what you're doing: http://www.crbond.com/filters.htm
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2006
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?