I don't quite understand the treatment of discrete symmetries, for example, in Peskin's QFT book:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Because by definition time reversal symmetry should flip the spin and momentum, so he defined an operation to flip the spin state of a two-component spinor, i.e.

[tex] \xi^{-s} \equiv -i\sigma^2(\xi^s)^* \quad\cdots(1)[/tex]

, from this definition of spin flip, we have [tex] \xi^{-s} = (\xi^2 , -\xi^1) [/tex].

And, previously, he has already solved the Dirac equation and got solutions:

[tex] u^s(p) = (\sqrt{p\cdot\sigma}\xi^s , \sqrt{p\cdot\bar{\sigma}} \xi^s) [/tex]

[tex] v^s(p) = (\sqrt{p\cdot\sigma}\eta^s , -\sqrt{p\cdot\bar{\sigma}} \eta^s) [/tex]

where [tex]\xi^s, \eta^s[/tex] are two-component spinor basis.

Now he chooses

[tex] v^s(p) = (\sqrt{p\cdot\sigma}\xi^{-s} , -\sqrt{p\cdot\bar{\sigma}} \xi^{-s}) [/tex]

and he defines

[tex] a^{-s}_{\mathbf{p}} = (a^s_{\mathbf{p}} , -a_{\mathbf{p}}^1) , b^{-s}_{\mathbf{p}} = (b^s_{\mathbf{p}} , -b_{\mathbf{p}}^1) [/tex]

Then, he can compute [tex] T\psi T = \cdots = \gamma^1\gamma^3 \psi(-t,\mathbf{x})[/tex]

My questions:

(1) Why he defined the spin flip by eq(1)? and why does he define [tex]a_{\mathbf{p}}^{-s}[/tex] in such a way? Why doesn't he just define [tex] \xi^{-s} = (\xi^2 , \xi^1) [/tex]?

(2) He worked out all these discrete symmetric transformation of spinor fields in a particular representation of gamma matrices, i.e. chiral representation of gamma matrices. Is it possible to deal with discrete symmetries without working in a particular representation? Is the result he gets representation independent?

(3) Is it possible to define discrete symmetries in other dimensions? They can be defined only in certain dimensions or in arbitrary dimensions?

Thank you so much.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# C, P, T discrete symmetries

Loading...

Similar Threads - discrete symmetries | Date |
---|---|

A Classical Mechanics: Continuous or Discrete universe | Mar 6, 2018 |

B Why did Max Planck assume discrete energy values? | Sep 16, 2017 |

I Normalizing a discrete sum | Mar 10, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**