The neutral pion is dominantly decaying to 2 photons via electromagnetic interaction [itex] \pi^0 \rightarrow 2 \gamma[/itex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

However if one allows for P-violation in electromagnetic interactions, he will also get C violation (due to CPT theorem). In that case a decay of the form [itex] \pi^0 \rightarrow 3 \gamma[/itex] could be observable.

I read in "Discrete symmetries and CP Violation: From experiment to theory" by M.S.Sozzi that without the selection rule applied on the ##\pi^0## decay, then the rate of the three-gamma is reduced by a factor of order [itex]\mathcal{O}(\alpha)[/itex] (that means ~130 times less), since we have 3 photon vertices instead of 2. Would that imply that:

[itex]\frac{Br(\pi^0 \rightarrow 3 \gamma )}{Br(\pi^0 \rightarrow 2 \gamma)} \sim 10^{-2}[/itex]?

How can this be in agreement with the experimental result of [itex] <3~ 10^{-8}[/itex]? It's not and that's why we say that C-invariance is there...then why looking for the 3-photon decay?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# C-violating pion0 decay

Loading...

Similar Threads - violating pion0 decay | Date |
---|---|

I Why does the long-lived kaon only rarely decay to two pions? | Feb 11, 2018 |

I CP transformation, charge conjugation and antimatter | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Direct and indirect CP violation | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Mattauch violation at 247? | Oct 6, 2017 |

B Evidence for CP violation in the baryon sector | Oct 13, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**