1. PF Contest - Win "Conquering the Physics GRE" book! Click Here to Enter
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Calc II: integration of x arctan x

  1. Sep 21, 2004 #1


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    so, I know the integration by formula for this, since it's in my handy book of formulas, but i'm required to do this by parts, and then use a technique from the lesson to integrate it further.

    The problem: [tex] \int \,x \arctan \,x \,dx [/tex]

    (i'm assuming tan to the negative first power is the same as arctan)

    the answer: [tex] \frac{1+x^2}{2}arctan x - \frac{x}{2} [/tex]

    My process so far:

    I first looked at dividing by parts with u=x and dv= arctan x dx. That got really messy trying to integrate tan, so I flipped them over.

    What erks me is I don't feel like I'm violating any rules, I'm just getting a different answer.

    So I set u=arctan x and dv= x dx
    so [itex] du=\frac{1}{x^2+1} [/itex] and [itex] v= \frac{1}{2}x^2 [/itex]

    which leaves me with:

    (using uv - [itex] \int [/itex]dvu)

    [tex] \frac{1}{2}x^2 arctan x - \frac{1}{2}\int \frac{x^2}{x^2+1} [/tex]

    I use long division on that last term so that I have:

    [tex]\int 1 - \frac{1}{x^2+1} [/tex]

    which results in

    [tex] \frac{1}{2}x^2 arctan x - \frac{1}{2}arctan x - \frac{1}{2}x [/tex]
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 21, 2004 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I get a postive sign for the middle term.
  4. Sep 21, 2004 #3


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    how does that help me get closer to the answer? I see my mistake of not carrying the - sign, but I'm still not quite sure how arctan adds up and substracts...
  5. Sep 21, 2004 #4

    If I understand "tan to the negative first power" correctly, and if I'm not mistaking, your assumption is not correct:
    (tan x)^-1 does not equal arctan x.
    (tan x)^-1=(sin x / cos x)^-1=cos x / sin x=cot x
  6. Sep 22, 2004 #5


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    i understood arctan as the inverse of tan, which can't be found by simply switching the fractions, that would just be cotangent, not tan to the negative first power. This is my understanding...

    I'm more concerned with how to manipulate arcsin terms so that I can get an answer that looks like the books answer.
  7. Sep 22, 2004 #6
    I agree.
    Well, if you get a positive sign for the middle term, then you have the right answer, don't you?
  8. Sep 22, 2004 #7


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    that seems to be what Tide implied.

    I manipulated it algebraically and it appears correct. But when you already know the answer, you tend to manipulate in your favor. I'll double check.

    Thanks everyone for your help
  9. Sep 23, 2004 #8
    What are you talking about with this algebraic manipulation?!?!

    You simply add like terms....

    x^2/2 + 1/2 = (1 + x^2)/2

    (remember fractions....add the numerators, keep the denominator)

    and (1/2)x is the same as x/2

    I don't see where the algebraic manipulation comes into play?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Threads - Calc integration arctan Date
Stuck on vector integral, Calc III log_2 Oct 1, 2005
Integration/calc work? what did i do wrong Sep 25, 2005
Calc integration Apr 25, 2005
Calc. Double Integrals: Setting Limits Apr 2, 2005