So when deriving the Euler-Lagrange equation for the simple case (the integrand is just a function of x, y(x), and y'(x) where y is defined on [a,b]) we're interested in those functions which connect two points (x_0, y(x_0)) and (x_1, y(x_1)). But these functions don't form a function space in themselves. So are we just looking at all functions on [a,b] with continuous second derivatives and out of those, considering the ones which satisfy the boundary conditions we're interested in?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

This must be the case, because in the derivation we then increment y(x) by an h(x) where h(x_0)=h(x_1)=0. This wouldn't make sense unless we were considering a larger space than just those functions satisfying the boundary conditions. Just let me know if I'm on the right track here.

Thanks,

Kevin

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Calc of Variations quickie

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Calc Variations quickie | Date |
---|---|

I Partial derivative used in Calc of Variation | Sep 11, 2016 |

Calc of variations, minimizing functionals question | Nov 20, 2015 |

Calc of variation - the variation of a derivative? | May 15, 2013 |

Variational Calc boundary question | Mar 9, 2012 |

Interesting Calc of Variations Problems | Aug 25, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**