Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Calculate (a) the total work done by the gas in the process

  1. May 23, 2003 #1

    I am totally lost on this one. There seems to be something missing from the problem. Here goes.

    A perfect gas is slowly compressed at a constant pressure of 2.0 atm from 10.0 L to 2.0 L. Heat is added to the gas holding the volume constant, and the pressure and temperature are allowed to rise until the temperature reaches its original value. Calculate (a) the total work done by the gas in the process, and (b) the total heat flow into the gas.

    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 5, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. May 23, 2003 #2
    The rules of the forum state that you have to show us where you got stuck before we can help :smile:.

    Why do you think there is something missing? What formulae do you know for Isobaric and Isochoric processes?
  4. May 23, 2003 #3
    Well, shouldn't there be some kind of stated temperature? From all my notes that seems to be the missing piece. Not sure what are Isobaric and Isochoric processes. This was given as a research project.
  5. May 23, 2003 #4
    OK - this is interesting 'cause I'm studying this topic for my upcoming final.

    "Slowly compressed" tells you that heat is being removed while the volume decreases -- otherwise 2 Atm. pressure would not be enough to compress the gas to 1/5 of its volume.

    Then, holding the volume constant, enough heat is added back to raise the temp. to its original value (while the pressure also increases).

    Think about the implications of that. Does that help?
  6. May 23, 2003 #5
    Ok, Isobaric - constant pressure
    Isochoric - constant volume - both which you've got here. Looking up these two terms would definitely be a good place to start. P-V diagrams could also be useful.

    You should be able to find formulae/derivations for the work done in each of these processes.

    You'll also need to know the first law of thermodynamics to do any of it.

    Oh and is 10.0 L 10 litres? So you have the pressure and volume and from the ideal gas law you can work out some temperatures if you need to. Again, definitely look this up if you haven't done anything on it.
  7. May 23, 2003 #6
    I thought I knew how to do this, but I realize now that I can't unless I assume some quantity, such as 1 mole (or any other specific quantity), of gas.

    Can it be done if the quantity and starting temperature are both unknown?
  8. May 23, 2003 #7

    I am looking up this thing but don't see how it can be done without starting temperature, or as you said, to assume a the quantity. Unless I am missing a formula somewhere along the line that helps us to arrive at the temperature.
  9. May 23, 2003 #8
    It's easy to determine the work; actually it's negative work. For that I get -1.62 x 103 J. That's just a function of the pressure and change in volume -- independent of the type and amount of gas. But then, some unknown amount of heat energy is removed while the gas is compressed. Since the pressure is constant, the temp at the end of the first phase must be 1/5 of the initial temperature (in Kelvins). But that doesn't seem to be enough information.

    Did you post the question exactly as it was printed in your book?

    (Do you know what the answer is supposed to be?)

    edit: heat is DEFINITELY being removed during the first phase. Some to lower the temperature, and more to reduce the volume. But I don't see how we can determine how much is removed if we don't know any more details about the gas; and if we don't know what was removed, I don't see how we can determine how much had to be added back.
    Last edited: May 23, 2003
  10. May 23, 2003 #9
    I posted it exactly as it was given to us. From his post, Mulder seems to think that you can work out the temperatures. Not sure how he arrived at that.
  11. May 23, 2003 #10
    Ok, I can work out the new pressure, from which you should be able to work out the heat flow. I'm not going to post the working (quite a few lines) till I get up tomorrow though since it's 3.45am here, when I've had a check through it, incase I've made a huge mistake :wink:.

    Will post again in a few hours.
  12. May 23, 2003 #11

    I still don't see how you arrived at the work. Sorry, but I'm a dud at Physics. This is my last class before graduation and I am so lost. What formula did you use to get the work. Nothing I use
  13. May 23, 2003 #12
    Pressure is constant so work is given by
    w = p * (vf - vi)
    w = 2 atm. * 1.013*105 Pa./atm. * (-8)*10-3 m3
    = -1.62 * 103 J

    if I haven't blown the arithmetic somewhere...:)
  14. May 24, 2003 #13
    hmm sorry msdjohnson without knowing, say the number of moles of the gas (unless theres some trick I'm missing). I thought with it returning to it's original temperature, some unknowns might cancel and disappear, but this didn't happen. Unless the answer for the heat transfer can actually only be worked out in terms of the number of moles or something, you might need some input from one of the many people cleverer than me on here, though I'll have another look at it over the weekend :smile:
  15. May 24, 2003 #14
    Thanks Mulder. Thank you too gnome. Your help is much appreciated. I will contact the professor to see if there is something missing.
  16. May 24, 2003 #15
    Thanks for working on this, Mulder. I'm still playing around with this but not getting very far. Something like this will probably be on my final exam; I hope my prof. isn't this nasty.

    If we assume there is 1 mole of gas, then we can say
    T1 = P1v1/nR
    T1 = 2.026*105Pa. * 10-2m3/8.314
    T1 = 244 K

    T2 = P1v2/nR
    T1 = 2.026*105Pa. * 2*10-3m3/8.314
    T2 = 48.7 K

    P2 = nRT1/v2
    P2 = 8.314*244/(2*10-3m3)
    P2 = 1.014*106 Pa. = 10 Atm.

    But I still can't see any way to determine how much heat is added in the last step without knowing more about the gas -- monatomic, diatomic, etc. or unless I am told how much heat was removed during the compression phase.
  17. May 24, 2003 #16
    um, lol I think the answers been staring me straight in my face (as usual :wink:).

    Looking at the constant pressure step;

    [del]Q = nCp(T2 - T1)

    But T1 = PV1/nR and T2 = PV2/nR. Try that, could be this simple. No?
  18. May 24, 2003 #17
    Yes, but we don't know what Cp is.
    monatomic/diatomic/something else? An ideal gas can be any of these.

    I've been trying to combine this with the CV phase using Cp = Cv+R, trying to get the Cv to drop out, but all I get is hopelessly messy expressions & no apparent progress. :frown:
  19. May 24, 2003 #18
    Well I don't think that's that important. msdjohnson I'm sure can check it with his teacher/prof., I was just assuming that by 'perfect' it meant ideal monatomic (Cp = 5R/2).
    I was thinking that if he wasn't familiar with terms like Isobaric then, although it's a research project (and near graduation = high school?), it won't be extremely complicated. Just my thoughts :smile:

    Incidentally I also have a thermal and kinetic exam next week which covers a lot of this.
    Last edited: May 24, 2003
  20. May 24, 2003 #19
    Thanks for all your help guys. We all agree that there is something missing from the project. I will wait to hear from my professor.
  21. May 24, 2003 #20
    You're very welcome. Thanks for posting an interesting question. It helped me review for my final.

    Mulder, good luck on yours.

    I'll post if I get stuck on anything; you do the same.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook