Calculating Angular Velocity of a Pulley under Varying Force

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
Beretta
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A pulley of moment of inertia 0.021kg-m^2 and radius 0.12m is acted upon by a force which varies in time as F= 0.23t + 0.12t^2 where F is in Newton and t is in second. suppose that the pulley is initially rotating at 0.18 r/s and the force acts tangentially to the pulley. Find the magnitude of the angular velocity of the pulley two seconds after the force began to act on the pulley.

I was thinking if I can use F(tan) r = I (alpha)

alpha = (0.12m(0.23t+0.12t^2))/0.21kgm^2 to get the accelration and then plug it in

w = wi + (alpha)t to get the velocity?

Is my reasoning correct?

What if I integrate the Force to get the work W, and then W = Kf - Ki?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Beretta said:
I was thinking if I can use F(tan) r = I (alpha)

alpha = (0.12m(0.23t+0.12t^2))/0.21kgm^2 to get the accelration
Good!
and then plug it in

w = wi + (alpha)t
That equation assumes constant alpha, which is not the case here. You have to integrate to find the final omega.
 
That equation assumes constant alpha, which is not the case here. You have to integrate to find the final omega.


You mean intergrate in the Force to get K = 1/2 Iw^2? I'm a bit lost! What do you mean?
 
Last edited:
Beretta said:
You mean intergrate in the Force to get K = 1/2 Iw^2? I'm a bit lost! What do you mean?
You have [itex]\alpha (t)[/itex]. So realize that [itex]d\omega/dt = \alpha (t)[/itex], so:
[tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]
 
Beretta said:
w = wi + (alpha)t to get the velocity?
Is my reasoning correct?

Nope,as Doc said,u need to integrate this relation

[tex]d\omega=\alpha dt[/tex]

between corresponding limits.

Beretta said:
What if I integrate the Force to get the work W, and then W = Kf - Ki?

Well,you figure it out.Is it possible without finding [itex]\theta (t)[/itex] and reversing it.?? :rolleyes:
[tex]\frac{I}{2}(\omega_{f}^{2}-\omega_{i}^{2})=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{f}} F(t(\theta))r d\theta[/tex]

Daniel.
 
Doc Al said:
You have [itex]\alpha (t)[/itex]. So realize that [itex]d\omega/dt = \alpha (t)[/itex], so:
[tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]

Do I need to go through this?

dextercioby said:
Nope,as Doc said,u need to integrate this relation

[tex]d\omega=\alpha dt[/tex]

between corresponding limits.



Well,you figure it out.Is it possible without finding [itex]\theta (t)[/itex] and reversing it.?? :rolleyes:
[tex]\frac{I}{2}(\omega_{f}^{2}-\omega_{i}^{2})=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{f}} F(t(\theta))r d\theta[/tex]

Daniel.


Can't I just use [tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]
But do I need to subtract the initial omega that is given from the final omega?

One more question please: when I did multiply the force equation by the radius, should I do the dot product or just multiply it commutatively. the reason I'm asking is the units when multiplying 0.12m by 0.23t + 0.12t^2 of course its m/t where t is in seconds. but after that I have to divide the answer by the moment of inertia which is kg m^2. Logicaly I know the answer should be in m/s^2 since its accelration and I also know that accelration could be written in N/kg, but here I have m(t)/kg m^2.
 
Last edited:
Beretta said:
Can't I just use [tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]
But do I need to subtract the initial omega that is given from the final omega?
[tex]\omega_f = \omega_i + \Delta \omega[/tex]

Also realize that the units of "0.23t + 0.12t^2" are Newtons (when t is in seconds), and the units of torque are N-m. The units of [itex]\omega[/itex] will be radians/sec.
 
Doc Al said:
[tex]\omega_f = \omega_i + \Delta \omega[/tex]

Also realize that the units of "0.23t + 0.12t^2" are Newtons (when t is in seconds), and the units of torque are N-m. The units of [itex]\omega[/itex] will be radians/sec.

I keep thinking about rotation in terms of motion. Yes, radian/sec not m/s.
I really appreciate all your help guys. Thank you very much.
 
Beretta said:
Do I need to go through this?

Yes,it's the only way to get the answer.


Beretta said:
Can't I just use [tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]

U can.Doc gave you the integral formula,i gave u the differential formula.

Beretta said:
]But do I need to
subtract the initial omega that is given from the final omega?

Nope,correct integration will give the result.

Beretta said:
One more question please: when I did multiply the force equation by the radius, should I do the dot product or just multiply it commutatively. the reason I'm asking is the units when multiplying 0.12m by 0.23t + 0.12t^2 of course its m/t where t is in seconds. but after that I have to divide the answer by the moment of inertia which is kg m^2. Logicaly I know the answer should be in m/s^2 since its accelration and I also know that accelration could be written in N/kg, but here I have m(t)/kg m^2.

The problem gives the force without units.It should be Newtons.But the constants are given numerically:they should be measured,first in Newtons per second,and the second in Newtons per second squared.

Daniel.