Calculating Flux for non-lambertian emitter

  • Thread starter chrisewolf
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Flux
In summary: Your Name]In summary, the conversation discusses the struggle with calculating the luminous flux for an LED with a non-lambertian emission profile. The solution involves integrating the luminance over the differential solid angle and dividing it by the number of electrons generated to find the desired ratio.
  • #1
chrisewolf
2
0
Hey everyone!

I am struggling with the following problem:
I am calculating the ratio of photons emitted to electrons generated in an LED. Due to the architecture the device shows a strong cavity effect and as such the emission profile is not lambertian but very "flat".
Unfortunately I can not use an integrating sphere with my apparatus. So I tried to measure the luminance (cd/m^2) for angles from the surface normal down to 80°. Indeed this measurements show a strong deviation from the lambertian cosine law.

Now I need to calculate the luminous flux (for an lambertian this is [itex]\Phi=\pi L[\latex]) but I am not sure how to properly do so for my case (though this seems like very basic optics).

The main confusion stems from the inclusion of the solid angle. I do not know how to properly discretize the solid angle element to somehow "sum up" over the half sphere I effectively measure (that is the luminance shows no dependence on the azimuth).


I am very thankful for every tip!

Have a nice sunday!
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2



Hi Chris,

I understand your struggle with calculating the luminous flux for your LED with a non-lambertian emission profile. In this case, the solid angle element you need to consider is the differential solid angle, dΩ, which is defined as the area of a spherical cap divided by the square of the radius of the sphere.

To properly calculate the luminous flux, you will need to integrate the luminance (cd/m^2) over the differential solid angle, dΩ, from 0 to 2π in azimuth and from 0 to 80° in elevation. This will give you the total luminous flux emitted by your LED in all directions. The equation for this integration is:

Φ = ∫∫L(θ,φ)cosθsinθdθdφ

Where L(θ,φ) is the luminance at a given angle θ and azimuth φ. This integral can be simplified by using the fact that your luminance does not depend on the azimuth, so you can integrate only over the elevation angle θ, from 0 to 80°. The equation then becomes:

Φ = 2π∫L(θ)cosθsinθdθ

Once you have calculated the total luminous flux, you can then divide it by the number of electrons generated to find the ratio of photons emitted to electrons generated.

I hope this helps and have a nice Sunday!

 

1. How is flux calculated for non-lambertian emitters?

Flux for non-lambertian emitters can be calculated using the equation F = Icosϕ, where F is the flux, I is the irradiance, and ϕ is the angle between the normal vector of the surface and the direction of the incoming light.

2. What is the difference between flux and irradiance?

Flux refers to the total amount of light energy emitted from a source, while irradiance is the amount of light energy per unit area that falls on a surface. Flux takes into account the direction of light, while irradiance does not.

3. How does the angle of the surface affect flux calculations for non-lambertian emitters?

The angle of the surface, represented by ϕ, plays a crucial role in flux calculations for non-lambertian emitters. As the angle increases, the amount of light that hits the surface decreases, resulting in a lower flux value.

4. Can flux be negative for non-lambertian emitters?

Yes, flux can be negative for non-lambertian emitters if the angle ϕ is greater than 90 degrees. In this case, the surface is facing away from the light source and will not receive any light, resulting in a negative flux value.

5. How does the surface material affect flux calculations for non-lambertian emitters?

The surface material can affect flux calculations for non-lambertian emitters by altering the value of the coefficient of reflectance, which is used to calculate the irradiance value in the equation F = Icosϕ. Different materials have different coefficients of reflectance, resulting in different flux values.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
555
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top