Calculating the torque required for a reciprocating saw using a Scotch yoke mechanism

  • #1
howardt0818
9
0
TL;DR Summary
I am trying to calculate the required Torque to drive an object at a given speed.
I am designing a reciprocating saw that I plan to use a scotch-yoke mechanism to convert rotational kinetic energy into linear kinetic energy.
I want to spec out a motor and the final thing I need to calculate is the required torque. The motor must be 12 Volts and I need to know the required torque so I can purchase a motor.

Saw blade weight: 1.5 lbs
Desired cut travel: 2 inches
Desired RPM: 800 RPM

To achieve a cut travel of 2 inches, the scotch yoke circle that will be attached directly to the motor must be 2 inches in diameter.
IMG_3474.jpg


What equation could I use to calculate this?

Power and current can be altered to achieve this but the voltage will be operating at 12V and the motor will be DC geared most-likely.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
howardt0818
9
0
If I calculate the load torque as simply the force multiplied by the radius - 1.5lb-in in this case - does that mean this is also the torque rating required by the motor to achieve 700 RPM?
 
  • #3
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
Welcome to PF.
You will need to know the force applied by the teeth as they cut the (as yet) unspecified material, and how many teeth will be engaged at one time.
That will depend on the tooth profile, and the method used to cut or rip saw dust crumbs out of the bulk.
 
  • #4
Lnewqban
Homework Helper
Gold Member
2,749
1,512
If I calculate the load torque as simply the force multiplied by the radius - 1.5lb-in in this case - does that mean this is also the torque rating required by the motor to achieve 700 RPM?
Consider that your motor will need to accelerate and decelerate that mass between zero and maximum cutting speed in a sinusoidal way twice the rotational speed.
The energy required to cut also depends on the normal force that the tool applies onto the material and on the type of cooling-lubricant to be used, if any.

The mechanism itself wil steal some energy as well due to friction (which increases with cuting normal force) and vibrations.
You will need an additional slider located closer to the motor, as wel as a mechanism to follow the depth of the cut while keeping steady normal force.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
@howardt0818
Different materials are cut with different styles of saw-teeth.

A bread-knife is designed to slice, without producing crumbs. The teeth vary the pressure applied to the cutting surface. But a bread-knife is not really a saw that cuts; a knife slices.

A chainsaw or a circular saw, collects the saw-dust cut in a large gullet during the pass of the stroke, until the dust is carried from the slot being cut = kerf, and then released from the gullet outside the kerf. That does not work well with a reciprocating saw as the gullets get clogged.

A reciprocating hacksaw has many small teeth that alternately cut, and progressively pass the crumbs along and out of the kerf. Each tooth is offset to the side to cut a wider kerf than the blade material. The hacksaw blade should be lifted while it is being returned for the next stroke. That reduces tooth wear and pushes the dust from the kerf more efficiently.

Your diagram seems to show a 2” tooth pitch, with a 2” reciprocation. That will not function well as a saw because there may be parts which do not get cut, while material may be trapped in the kerf. But it might work as a bread-knife, or for slicing soft material.

That is why the material and the tooth geometry are important.
What will you be cutting.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman and Lnewqban
  • #6
jrmichler
Mentor
2,011
2,581
What are you cutting? 800 SPM is way too fast for cutting steel if you want any blade life at all. That blade speed will cut wood just fine, but the mechanical forces at 13 cuts per second will be challenging. The Scotch yoke needs clearance to operate, and the load rattles back and forth within that clearance. Too much clearance will cause it to pound itself to pieces. Too little clearance will cause binding. Scotch yokes work best in an oil bath because the oil helps to cushion the impact of the load moving back and forth within the clearance.

How large a motor? Start by measuring the cutting force by pulling a blade with a spring scale. Then multiply by about three to account for different materials and blades, add in the slider bearing friction, and add in the Scotch yoke friction. Then multiply by the one inch radius to get driven torque. Add in the speed reducer friction and divide by the speed reducer ratio to get the motor torque.

The cutting force is not the mass of the blade. The cutting force can be much larger than the total weight of the blade, especially with a new, sharp blade. And depending on the material being cut.
 
  • #7
howardt0818
9
0
Welcome to PF.
You will need to know the force applied by the teeth as they cut the (as yet) unspecified material, and how many teeth will be engaged at one time.
That will depend on the tooth profile, and the method used to cut or rip saw dust crumbs out of the bulk.
This will be cutting leafy greens, 30 inches of saw blade and 30 inch bed of leafy greens. For simplicity sake let's just focus on the weigh of the blade and less so on the actual cutting, as I am mostly trying to calculate specs for the motor to simply move the saw blade at a desired speed.
 
  • #8
howardt0818
9
0
What are you cutting? 800 SPM is way too fast for cutting steel if you want any blade life at all. That blade speed will cut wood just fine, but the mechanical forces at 13 cuts per second will be challenging. The Scotch yoke needs clearance to operate, and the load rattles back and forth within that clearance. Too much clearance will cause it to pound itself to pieces. Too little clearance will cause binding. Scotch yokes work best in an oil bath because the oil helps to cushion the impact of the load moving back and forth within the clearance.

How large a motor? Start by measuring the cutting force by pulling a blade with a spring scale. Then multiply by about three to account for different materials and blades, add in the slider bearing friction, and add in the Scotch yoke friction. Then multiply by the one inch radius to get driven torque. Add in the speed reducer friction and divide by the speed reducer ratio to get the motor torque.

The cutting force is not the mass of the blade. The cutting force can be much larger than the total weight of the blade, especially with a new, sharp blade. And depending on the material being cut.
Apologies for leaving those fine details out. This will be for a leafy-green plant harvesting mechanism. The motor will be operated at 12V - size, current, and power can be decided after the fact. This is mostly risk reduction protocol I am taking at the moment to see how well the scotch-yoke mechanism can work for exactly this purpose. If successful, I can then get into the finer details such as force-per-tooth. Thanks!
 
  • #9
howardt0818
9
0
@howardt0818
Different materials are cut with different styles of saw-teeth.

A bread-knife is designed to slice, without producing crumbs. The teeth vary the pressure applied to the cutting surface. But a bread-knife is not really a saw that cuts; a knife slices.

A chainsaw or a circular saw, collects the saw-dust cut in a large gullet during the pass of the stroke, until the dust is carried from the slot being cut = kerf, and then released from the gullet outside the kerf. That does not work well with a reciprocating saw as the gullets get clogged.

A reciprocating hacksaw has many small teeth that alternately cut, and progressively pass the crumbs along and out of the kerf. Each tooth is offset to the side to cut a wider kerf than the blade material. The hacksaw blade should be lifted while it is being returned for the next stroke. That reduces tooth wear and pushes the dust from the kerf more efficiently.

Your diagram seems to show a 2” tooth pitch, with a 2” reciprocation. That will not function well as a saw because there may be parts which do not get cut, while material may be trapped in the kerf. But it might work as a bread-knife, or for slicing soft material.

That is why the material and the tooth geometry are important.
What will you be cutting.
Apologies for leaving out that information. This will be for cutting leafy-greens grown on a 30-inch bed.
 
  • #10
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
It seems that you are slicing, not sawing.
I assume you cut down against the leafy material, held against a cutting board.
There should be no material produced as dust.
The cut material will fall away from the knife.
Is that correct?
 
  • #11
howardt0818
9
0
It seems that you are slicing, not sawing.
I assume you cut down against the leafy material, held against a cutting board.
There should be no material produced as dust.
The cut material will fall away from the knife.
Is that correct?
There will not be a cutting board. There will be a rotating "mop-head" like system to sweep the cut leaves behind the saw and onto a conveyer belt. If you would like, I can provide images of a similar product that resembles the action I am trying to accomplish.
 
  • #12
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
A picture would be useful, as a link or drag and drop onto your next post.
 
  • #13
howardt0818
9
0
A picture would be useful, as a link or drag and drop onto your next post.
1604464587536.png
 
  • #14
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
I see. I believe you show what is often called a finger mower.
It is usual to have a fixed plate with fingers that supports the reciprocating cutting knife. The fixed comb of fingers prevent the crop being moved sideways by the knife. The reciprocating knife is made from many triangular teeth that slice the crop against the sides of the fingers.
That suggests your knife will be reciprocating against a part lubricated plate, rather than in free space, so there will be additional friction in the system.

Because of the weight of the reciprocating knife, you will need an eccentric counterbalance on the drive shaft, or it will shake apart the motor and the bearings. The weight of the circulating counterbalance will change the peak torque requirement on the motor.
I cannot see how you can balance that easily with a scotch yoke driving the knife.
 
  • #15
howardt0818
9
0
I see. I believe you show what is often called a finger mower.
It is usual to have a fixed plate with fingers that supports the reciprocating cutting knife. The fixed comb of fingers prevent the crop being moved sideways by the knife. The reciprocating knife is made from many triangular teeth that slice the crop against the sides of the fingers.
That suggests your knife will be reciprocating against a part lubricated plate, rather than in free space, so there will be additional friction in the system.

Because of the weight of the reciprocating knife, you will need an eccentric counterbalance on the drive shaft, or it will shake apart the motor and the bearings. The weight of the circulating counterbalance will change the peak torque requirement on the motor.
I cannot see how you can balance that easily with a scotch yoke driving the knife.
If not a scotch yoke, what would be a typical method of driving a machine like this?
 
  • #16
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
If not a scotch yoke, what would be a typical method of driving a machine like this?
For a vertical axis motor, a crank pin with half the balance weight above and half below the connecting rod to the knife.
If using a finger mower, or sickle mower, with a cutter bar you might search for “balanced cutter bar”, or “cutter bar” with “double alternate movement”. They do not have the same balance problem. They are more like a hand held hedge trimmer.
The style of teeth on the bar will be determined by the width of the leaf or stem you are cutting.
 
  • #17
howardt0818
9
0
For a vertical axis motor, a crank pin with half the balance weight above and half below the connecting rod to the knife.
If using a finger mower, or sickle mower, with a cutter bar you might search for “balanced cutter bar”, or “cutter bar” with “double alternate movement”. They do not have the same balance problem. They are more like a hand held hedge trimmer.
The style of teeth on the bar will be determined by the width of the leaf or stem you are cutting.
On a more simplified matter - in order for the motor to rotate the 1.5 pound load attached to it, assume a maximum of 2 lbs including friction forces, how would one calculate the torque required to rotate said load at that speed? EDIT: Power can be up to 40 Watts available
 
  • #18
Baluncore
Science Advisor
12,350
6,423
how would one calculate the torque required to rotate said load at that speed?
It goes something like this.
Convert everything to SI units. Then it all comes out in watts = joule per second.

A force of 2 pounds ≈ 1 kg force = 9.8 Newton. ( kgf * g = force in Newton ).
Because you reciprocate through 2”, the radius of the crank is 1” minimum = 25.4 mm.
Final drive shaft torque = 9.8 N * 0.025 m = 0.245 N·m.

There are 2π radians per turn, and 60 sec in a minute.
750 RPM = 750 / 60 = 12.5 rev/sec = 12.5 * 2π = 78.54 radians/sec .

Power in watts = torque * angular velocity.
∴ Required power = 0.245 N·m * 78.54 radians/sec = 19.25 watts.
 

Suggested for: Calculating the torque required for a reciprocating saw using a Scotch yoke mechanism

Replies
2
Views
975
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
701
Replies
8
Views
760
Replies
6
Views
779
Replies
4
Views
958
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Top