Calculation of the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom

In summary: To diminish the deviation, we can include higher order terms in the Taylor series, by including more terms in the expansion of the testfunction.
  • #1
Tuffi
2
0
A hydrogen atom placed in an electrical field results in a changed energy level and a changed eigenfunction, compared to the free atom. To examine this effect, we choose a homogenous electrical field of the force F, whose field lines run along parallel to the z-axis. The Schrödinger equation is in atomic units:

Ĥ(F)|ψ(F)> = (-1/2 Nabla^2 - 1/r+ Frcosθ) |ψ(F)>
=(Ĥ_0+ Frcosθ)|ψ(F)> = ε(F) |ψ(F)>.
Here, Ĥ_0 is the Hamilton operator for the hydrogen atom in absence of the field. We want to calculate the upper limit for the ground state energy ε(F) in the field through the variational principle. As a testfunction we use:
|ϕ ̃> =c_1 |1s> + c_2 |2p_z>,
Where |1s> and |2p_z> are the exact, normalized eigenfunctions for the free hydrogen atom:
|1s> = √π e^(-r)
|2p_z> = √(32π) re^(-r⁄2) cosθ.
Why are the functions |2p_x> and |2p_y> not used in ϕ ̃>?
The actual variational problem consists in minimizing the expectancy value <ϕ ̃|Ĥ|ϕ ̃> according to the side condition <ϕ ̃|ϕ ̃> =1. Formulate the extremely initially with the method of the Lagrange multipliers. Show that this problem is equivalent to finding the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a (2x2)-Hamilton-matrix. (What is figured out for the matrix elements <1s| Ĥ(F) |1s>, <1s| Ĥ(F) |2p_z>, <2p_z | Ĥ(F) |1s>, and <2p_z | Ĥ(F) |2p_z> is not yet of interest at this point. These matrix elements can be abbreviated as H_11, H_12, H_21, and H_22 at this point, yet.)
Now determine the optimal values for the coefficients c_1 and c_2 and the upper limit for the energy ε(F) of the ground state in the field. (Hereto you must certainly calculate the matrix elements.)
To determine the electrical dipole polarizability α, ε(F) is developed from part c) in a Taylor series like (1 + x)^2 ≈1+ x⁄2…:
ε(F) ≈ ε(F=0)- 1/2 αF^2+ ….
Determine the value of α. How could you diminish the deviation?

Hints:
〖 Ĥ〗_0 |1s> = -1/2|1s> 〖 Ĥ〗_0 |2p_z> = -1/8|2p_z>
∫_0^∞▒〖r^n e^(-αr) dr= n!/α^(n + 1) 〗




Ĥ(F)|ψ(F)> = (-1/2 Nabla^2 - 1/r+ Frcosθ) |ψ(F)>
=(Ĥ_0+ Frcosθ)|ψ(F)> = ε(F) |ψ(F)>

|ϕ ̃> =c_1 |1s> + c_2 |2p_z>

|1s> = √π e^(-r)
|2p_z> = √(32π) re^(-r⁄2) cosθ

ε(F) ≈ ε(F=0)- 1/2 αF^2+ …

〖 Ĥ〗_0 |1s> = -1/2|1s> 〖 Ĥ〗_0 |2p_z> = -1/8|2p_z>
∫_0^∞▒〖r^n e^(-αr) dr= n!/α^(n + 1) 〗

To a) In my opinion these functions are perpendicular to the field so that a dipole polarizability is not possible.

To b) I guess my function is
|ϕ ̃> =c_1 |1s> + c_2 |2p_z>,
which is
|ϕ ̃> =c_1 | √π e^(-r)> + c_2 |√32π re^(-r⁄2) cosθ>.
The side condition is obviously
<ϕ ̃|ϕ ̃> =1.
Now my problem is how to set these two equations in a manner of Lagrange multipliers. Do I have to square the first equation to get equivalence to the second equation? What is my x and what is my y; r and θ? For my side condition I get F_λ=0=0. It does not make any sense to me. I would appreciate it if somebody could help me out of my confusion.

Thank you in advance.



Tuffi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
To b) The Lagrangian for the variational problem is L(c_1, c_2, λ) = <ϕ ̃|Ĥ|ϕ ̃> - λ[<ϕ ̃|ϕ ̃> - 1]. The equation to solve is ∂L/∂c_1 = 0, ∂L/∂c_2 = 0, ∂L/∂λ = 0.These three equations will form a system of equations for c_1, c_2 and λ. Once the optimal values for c_1 and c_2 are found, the upper limit for the energy ε(F) can be calculated by plugging in these values into the Lagrangian. For the matrix elements, the expectation value of the Hamiltonian with respect to the test function must be computed. This involves computing integrals of the form <ϕ ̃|Ĥ|ϕ ̃> = ∫ ϕ ̃*(r, θ) (Ĥ_0 + Frcosθ)ϕ ̃(r, θ) drdθ. The integrals can be evaluated using standard methods such as integration by parts or series expansion. To c) To determine the electrical dipole polarizability α, we need to expand ε(F) in a Taylor series. This can be done by first expanding the testfunction in powers of F, |ϕ ̃> = c_1 |1s> + c_2 |2p_z> + c_3 |1s>F + c_4 |2p_z>F + ... and then plugging this into the Hamiltonian and solving for the coefficients c_i. The Taylor series for ε(F) can then be written as ε(F) = ε(F=0) + c_3 <1s|Ĥ|1s>F + c_4 <2p_z|Ĥ|2p_z>F + ... From this, we can find the dipole polar
 

FAQ: Calculation of the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom

1. What is the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom?

The dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom refers to the ability of the atom to be distorted by an external electric field, resulting in a dipole moment. It is a measure of the atom's response to an applied electric field and is dependent on the atom's electronic structure.

2. How is the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom calculated?

The dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom can be calculated using quantum mechanical methods, such as the Hartree-Fock method or density functional theory (DFT). These methods involve solving the Schrödinger equation for the electronic wave function of the atom and using this to calculate the atom's polarizability.

3. What factors affect the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom?

The dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom is influenced by several factors, including the electron density distribution, the distance between the nucleus and the electron, and the energy state of the atom. It is also affected by external factors such as temperature and pressure.

4. What is the significance of the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom?

The dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom is an important parameter in understanding the atom's interaction with electric fields. It is also used in various theoretical calculations, such as the determination of molecular properties and the prediction of spectroscopic data.

5. How does the dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom compare to other atoms?

The dipole polarizability of the hydrogen atom is relatively low compared to other atoms due to its small size and simple electronic structure. However, it is still an important quantity in the study of atomic and molecular systems, and its value can vary depending on the specific method and level of theory used for calculation.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
264
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top