1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Calculus III: Derivatives and composition

  1. Oct 19, 2009 #1
    I need prove or disprove the following statement:

    If f: R^2->R^2 is a differentiable function whose derivative at (0,0) is not invertible, then there does not exist a differentiable function g: R^2->R^2 such that:

    (g o f)(X)=X



    I've been trying to find counter examples like crazy (f(x,y)=(x+y,x-y), (xy,x+y), etc.) but everything seems to agree. I think this is actually true, but I don't want an entire proof (I can do that work); just a hint or two as to which way I should begin to approach this (basically I just need a starting point).


    Nevermind; I found the trick. I realized if (g o f)(X)=X, the derivative of this must be the identity matrix. From there, no problems.
     
    Last edited: Oct 19, 2009
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Calculus III: Derivatives and composition
  1. Composite Derivative (Replies: 2)

Loading...