1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Calculus problem.

  1. Nov 30, 2003 #1

    AD

    User Avatar

    Not my own homework problem, but somebody else's.

    Parallel to a tall building runs a 6ft high fence. It is 2ft away from the building. What is the shortest ladder needed to reach the building from the other side of the fence?

    I've drawn a diagram for this problem (see attached).

    I've called the height above the ground at which the ladder touches the building 'h' and the distance of the base of the ladder from the fence 'x' and the length of the ladder 'L'.

    Then

    L2 = h2 + (x + 2)2

    I think that by expressing L as a function in terms of one of the variables, x or h, and differentiating with respect to that variable, I can find then find the minimum length of the ladder.

    By considering similar triangles

    6/x = h/(2 + x)

    So

    x = 12/(h - 6)

    And

    h = 12/x + 6

    But by substituting in either of these values, the differentiation dL/dx or dL/dh becomes horrible.

    Is there an easier way to solve this problem? Am I overlooking something? I'd like to see if I could find an easier function to differentiate.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 30, 2003 #2
    This is the trick: Look for an extremum of L2. You know that L is positive, so an extremum of L2 is also an extremum of L.
    I've tried
    [tex]
    \frac{d}{dh}L^2 = 0
    [/tex]
    It's lengthy but easy.

    Edit: I think the rest of your work is OK.
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2003
  4. Nov 30, 2003 #3

    AD

    User Avatar

    Okay, so I can do dL2/dx or dL2/dh rather than and dL/dx or dL/dh and that will make the maths easier.

    You've suggested dL2/dh.

    Substituting x = 12/(h - 6) into the equation for L2 means that I would have to differentiate

    h2 + [(12/(h - 6)) + 2]2

    with respect to h. Right?
     
  5. Nov 30, 2003 #4
    Correct.
    Simplify before you derive. A lot of things will cancel.:wink:
     
  6. Nov 30, 2003 #5

    AD

    User Avatar

    So

    L2 = h2 + [(12/(h - 6)) + 2]2

    = h2 + 144/[(h - 6)2] + 48/(h - 6) + 4

    What's cancelling?
     
  7. Nov 30, 2003 #6

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Oh, c'mon. Combine the fractions before you square!
     
  8. Nov 30, 2003 #7

    AD

    User Avatar

    To get

    L2 = h2 + 4h2/(h - 6)2

    ...?

    Can I simplify it further?
     
  9. Dec 1, 2003 #8
    I think this will do. Next, derive...
     
  10. Dec 1, 2003 #9

    AD

    User Avatar

    How? Using the quotient rule for the second term? Is that what you did?
     
  11. Dec 2, 2003 #10
    Yes.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Calculus problem.
  1. Calculus Problem (Replies: 9)

  2. Calculus Problem (Replies: 2)

  3. Calculus problem (Replies: 1)

  4. Calculus problem (Replies: 11)

  5. Calculus Problem (Replies: 2)

Loading...