Calculus-taylor series

  • Thread starter 413
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Series
In summary: So now you can see that they're all negative, and you can also see the pattern for the coefficients./*extra characters*/Yes, sorry that is a mistake on my part. I was wrong before, your original derivatives were correct and should all be negative. I apologize for the confusion and any mistakes it may have caused. But yes, as the other poster said, if you want to use
  • #1
413
41
0
f(x) =ln (1-x)

a) Compute f'(x), f''(x), f'''(x). Spot the pattern and give an expression for f ^(n) (x) [the n-th derivative of f(x)]

b) Compute the MacLaurin series of f(x) (i.e. the Taylor series of f(x) around x=0)

c) Compute the radius of convergence and determine the interval of convergence of the series in b).

d) Determine the Taylor series of f'(x) around x=0. Can you do so without using b)?

e) How would you have computed part b) if you had first done part d)?

for part a) i got, please check for me.

f'(x) = -1/(1-x)
f''(x) = -1/(1-x)^2
f'''(x) = -2/(1-x)^3

f^(n) (x) = -((n-1)!)/(1-x)^n
for n = 1,2,3,...

am i right so far, how do i do the other ones? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're off by a sing on the second derivative, and your patter will for the same reason be off by a sign for all even order derivatives. What problems are you having with the rest of the question, it is pretty straightforward to use the derivatives at 0 to find the MacLaurin series for the original function, and then use the ratio test to find the radius of convergence.
 
  • #3
oh the second derivative is f(x)=1/(1-x)^2 correct?

What is the expression for the n-th derivative now? What do i change to show that the signs is negative for all even order?
 
  • #4
413 said:
oh the second derivative is f(x)=1/(1-x)^2 correct?

What is the expression for the n-th derivative now? What do i change to show that the signs is negative for all even order?

Yes, that is correct. What is the sign of (-1)n when n is even? When n is odd?
 
  • #5
so that means i put a (-1)^n in front of my orginal equation?

f^(n) (x) = (-1)^n((n-1)!)/(1-x)^n like this?
 
  • #6
413 said:
so that means i put a (-1)^n in front of my orginal equation?

f^(n) (x) = (-1)^n((n-1)!)/(1-x)^n like this?

Yes. /*extra characters*/
 
  • #7
thanks, let me give part b) a try.

equation for Taylor series is f(x)= f(0) + [f'(0)/1!]*x + [f''(0)/2!]*x^2 + ...

I did...
f(0)=0
f'(0)=-1 thus f'(0)/1!=-1
f''(0)=1 thus f"(0)/2!=1/2
f'''(0)=-1 thus f'''(0)/3! =-1/3

therefore answer for part b is... taylor series of f(x)= (-x/1) +(x^2/2) - (x^3/3) +...
seems right, any mistakes?
 
  • #8
413 said:
thanks, let me give part b) a try.

equation for Taylor series is f(x)= f(0) + [f'(0)/1!]*x + [f''(0)/2!]*x^2 + ...

I did...
f(0)=0
f'(0)=-1 thus f'(0)/1!=-1
f''(0)=1 thus f"(0)/2!=1/2
f'''(0)=-1 thus f'''(0)/3! =-1/3

therefore answer for part b is... taylor series of f(x)= (-x/1) +(x^2/2) - (x^3/3) +...
seems right, any mistakes?

That looks right, except that f'''(0) is not -1.
 
  • #9
oh, its -2, then f'''(0)/3! would be -2/3?
taylor series become (x)= (-x/1) +(x^2/2) - 2(x^3/3) +...
 
  • #10
413 said:
oh, its -2, then f'''(0)/3! would be -2/3?
taylor series become (x)= (-x/1) +(x^2/2) - 2(x^3/3) +...

No, it was -2! not 2. So the coefficient would be -2!/3! which is -1/3, I don't think there was anything wrong with your Taylor series at all, just that you stated the value of the derivative incorrectly.
 
  • #11
i see, thanks for catching that. Usually for these questions, do i need to put it in the general forumla like with the reimann sums symbol? if so, how would i do it?
 
  • #12
413 said:
i see, thanks for catching that. Usually for these questions, do i need to put it in the general forumla like with the reimann sums symbol? if so, how would i do it?

You can if you want to, but if you do want to all you need is a general form for your coeffiecient of xn. In your case this is pretty easy because you can fairly easily see that the nth derivative at x=0 is (-1)n(n-1)! and then the coefficient of xn is just f(n)(0)/n!, so you can just substitute for the nth derivative at zero there and pretty easily write an infinite sum for the Taylor series.
 
  • #13
for finding the radius and interval of convergence you mention the ratio test, the ration test is ︱an+1/an︱, in my case, what is an?
 
  • #14
an is the coefficient of xn in the Taylor series, I told you how you could find this fairly eaily in my previous post, and it should also be fairly evident from the terms in your series.
 
  • #15
ok, i got that figured out.

now part d) Determine the Taylor series of f'(x) around x=0. Can you do so without using b)?
do i just repeat part b again?
 
  • #16
413 said:
ok, i got that figured out.

now part d) Determine the Taylor series of f'(x) around x=0. Can you do so without using b)?
do i just repeat part b again?

Part d can be done in one of two ways, both of which are fairly simple. If you use part b then you can differentiate the series found in part b term by term, or you could just as well just take the derivative of the original function and expand that in a Taylor series which is fairly easy since it is pretty much teh closed form for the geometric series. And this made me notice a mistake of my own, your original derivatives were correct, they should all be negative, not alternating I'm sorry about that.
 
  • #17
why? why isn't the 2nd derivative positive?
 
  • #18
Actually, the "an" to use in the ratio test to determine radius of convergence is the full term, Anxn. Of course, then the fraction |an+1/an| is just |(An+1/An)| |x|. That's why the ratio test works so nicely.
 
  • #19
so you mean that my derivatives are all positive? which means
f'(x) = -1/(1-x)
f''(x) = -1/(1-x)^2
f'''(x) = -2/(1-x)^3
 
  • #20
413 said:
so you mean that my derivatives are all positive? which means
f'(x) = -1/(1-x)
f''(x) = -1/(1-x)^2
f'''(x) = -2/(1-x)^3

Negative, not positive, but what you have here is correct.
 
  • #21
really? i thought the negatives actually cancels out.
 
  • #22
413 said:
really? i thought the negatives actually cancels out.

No, they don't cancel out.
 
  • #23
i don't get this one.

f^(n) (x) = -((n-1)!)/(1-x)^n
for n = 1,2,3,...

if you plug in n =1, the equation wouldn't just = 0?
 
  • #24
jkh4 said:
i don't get this one.

f^(n) (x) = -((n-1)!)/(1-x)^n
for n = 1,2,3,...

if you plug in n =1, the equation wouldn't just = 0?

No, you get 0! which is not 0.
 
  • #25
d_leet said:
No, you get 0! which is not 0.

but 0!/(1-x)^n is still not same as -1/(1-x)^1 when n = 1 right?
 
  • #26
jkh4 said:
but 0!/(1-x)^n is still not same as -1/(1-x)^1 when n = 1 right?

Well you get -0!/(1-x) which is the same thing as -1/(1-x).
 
  • #27
d_leet said:
Well you get -0!/(1-x) which is the same thing as -1/(1-x).

o...thanks

just curious, what's 0! when expand?
 
Last edited:
  • #28
jkh4 said:
o...thanks

just curious, what's 0! when expand?

0! = 1
/*extra characters*/
 
  • #29
d_leet said:
0! = 1
/*extra characters*/
thanks

by the way, for part c) Compute the radius of convergence and determine the interval of convergence of the series in b).

i do the radius of convergence with the equation x^n/n! that i figure from part b), just wondering if that's correct
 
  • #30
jkh4 said:
i do the radius of convergence with the equation x^n/n! that i figure from part b), just wondering if that's correct

That isn't the correct general term in the first place, and to find the radius of convergence the best way for this problem is either to notice the relation between the series you found and the geometric series or just use the ratio test.
 
  • #31
d_leet said:
That isn't the correct general term in the first place, and to find the radius of convergence the best way for this problem is either to notice the relation between the series you found and the geometric series or just use the ratio test.

you mean between the series i found in part b and the standard taylor series equation?
 
  • #32
jkh4 said:
you mean between the series i found in part b and the standard taylor series equation?

What is the standard taylor series equation? The best way to find the radius of convergence is probably to just use the ratio test.
 
  • #33
d_leet said:
What is the standard taylor series equation? The best way to find the radius of convergence is probably to just use the ratio test.

but what i don't understand is, when you do the ratio test

lim |An+1/An|

don't you need an equation involving n? for example like n^x/(n+1)
 
  • #34
jkh4 said:
but what i don't understand is, when you do the ratio test

lim |An+1/An|

don't you need an equation involving n? for example like n^x/(n+1)

Yes you need an equation for the general term of the series an which is one of the things should be found in the first part of this question.
 
  • #35
d_leet said:
Yes you need an equation for the general term of the series an which is one of the things should be found in the first part of this question.

okay, i think i start to get it...what you saying is using the equation derive in part a) right?
 

Similar threads

I Why prove Taylor's theorem with p(x)=q(x)−((b−a)^n/(b−x)^n)q(a)?
    • Calculus
Replies
9
Views
849
I Taylor Expansion Question about this Series
    • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Why is Big-O about how rapidly the Taylor graph approaches that of f(x)?
    • Calculus
Replies
19
Views
2K
B Why do I not understand what seems to be basic Calculus?
    • Calculus
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Understanding Theorem 13 from Calculus 7th ed, R. Adams, C. Essex, 4.10
    • Calculus
Replies
10
Views
2K
A Summing over continuum and uncountable numerocities
    • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
932
B Mean-Value Theorem, Taylor's formula, and error estimation
    • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Multivariable fundamental calculus theorem in Wald
    • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
I On (real) entire functions and the identity theorem
    • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
786
I Taylor expansion of f(x)=arctan(x) at infinity
    • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top