1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Support PF! Reminder for those going back to school to buy their text books via PF Here!
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Analysis Callahan vs. Fleming

  1. Mar 4, 2017 #1
    I have a knowledge of Calculus, Differential Equations, and Linear Algebra, I want to learn advanced calculus, but I'm wondering what book is the best choice, I want to learn it rigorously "enough" but not to the point where someone would call me a mathematician i.e. Calculus by Lang vs Calculus by Spivak, certainly Lang is rigorous but Spivak is at a higher level, though Lang is enough for physicist. I also want to learn it in differential forms approach after, i.e, Advanced Calculus: A Differential Forms Approach by Edwards. I have to choices,

    Advanced Calculus by Callahan - longer but has more geometric arguments and diagrams
    Functions of Several Variables by Fleming - shorter but harder?

    I think Fleming has an advantage because it is shorter, but Callahan is newer and might have some topics that are not in Fleming's book, it also has more explanations and diagrams. Which do you think suits me best? Do you think if I read Fleming instead of Callahan I'll miss some important discussions in Callahan? As of now I'm more into Fleming since it's shorter. I don't have much time to read two books fully, so I just need to choose one and concentrate on that.
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 9, 2017 #2
    Thanks for the thread! This is an automated courtesy bump. Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post? The more details the better.
     
  4. Mar 10, 2017 #3
    Fleming's book isn't especially short. I'd like the sections on differential forms to be a bit more fleshed out, but even there it's more verbose than Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds.

    I'd recommend Fleming because of the applied topology and Lebesgue integration on [itex]\mathbb{R}^n[/itex].
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Callahan vs. Fleming
  1. Lang vs Bourbaki (Replies: 12)

Loading...