Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Can any body do it?

  1. Apr 16, 2007 #1
    i have this problem and i am Trying to solve but it seems impossible so I need help
    (even matmatica unable solve it )
    seriesSum((2L+1)·(e^((((-((h)^(2)))·L·(L+1))/(2 J K)),L,0,∞)))

    or :
    seriesSum((2l+1)·(e^((((-((h)^(2)))·l·(l+1))/(2 J K)),l,0,∞)))

  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 16, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I doubt very much that Mathematica can't do it. I suspect you just don't LIKE Mathematica's answer! Since your sum has several powers of L in the numerator, and only constants in the denominator, the individual terms do NOT go to 0 and so the sum does not converge. (I am assuming that you (2 J K) is just the product of three numbers and not some special notation you chose not to define!)
  4. Apr 18, 2007 #3
    no you dont understand no body even Mathematica can do it i try
    so i need help???? even if you dont type 2*j*k
    mathematica cant solve it.
  5. Apr 18, 2007 #4

    Gib Z

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I bet It would be much easier to do if you rewrote it for us without so many Brackets. Im not even going to bother trying to decipher that.
  6. Apr 18, 2007 #5

    matt grime

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    No, *you* don't understand: since the terms do not tend to zero (according to HallsOfIvy), the sum does not exist. Further, even if it did exist, Mathematica would be able to tell you what it was, but not necessarily in a 'nice' closed formula involving the variables. You have made the common mistake of thinking that some thing is the answer if and only if it is a nice simple expression.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?