CExploring the Coastline Paradox: Are Dimensions Relative to the Observer?

In summary, dimensions are relative to the observer and can change depending on the perspective. However, in physics, we use mathematical models to study and understand objects and their behavior, which may involve representing them as points, planes, or spheres. The concept of the coastline paradox and fractal dimensions also provide interesting insights into the relativity of dimensions.
  • #1
Flying_Dutchman
9
0
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Flying_Dutchman said:
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?
No. The OBSERVED or APPARENT size will depend on distance but the actual will not.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest, Chestermiller and Ibix
  • #3
Flying_Dutchman said:
If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane
No - a point is always a point. If it looks different at any distance then it's an extended object. Similarly an extended object is an extended object always, even if you can't resolve it.

"I personally cannot see it therefore it does not exist" is not the way to do science.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest, Vanadium 50, russ_watters and 2 others
  • #4
Ibix said:
No - a point is always a point.
Follow-up question: How do we know?
Answer: Because we define it that way.
 
  • #5
Flying_Dutchman said:
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?

If you want to study something interesting about dimensions try this:

 
  • Like
Likes diogenesNY, QuantumQuest, Asymptotic and 1 other person
  • #6
Flying_Dutchman said:
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?
The point, the plane, and the sphere are all mathematical objects. In physics we create models that make use of these objects. For example, we can model Earth as a point and get a really good understanding of how it behaves relative to other members of our solar system. However, for other purposes we may model a patch of Earth's surface as a plane, like when we are building a house. For other purposes, we model it as a sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and russ_watters
  • #7

1. Can dimensions be relative?

Yes, dimensions can be relative in certain contexts. In physics, the concept of relativity states that the measurement of space and time can vary depending on the observer's frame of reference. This means that the dimensions of an object may appear different to different observers depending on their relative motion.

2. How does relativity affect our understanding of dimensions?

Relativity challenges the traditional understanding of dimensions as fixed and absolute. It suggests that dimensions are not independent of each other, but rather intertwined and influenced by the observer's perspective. This has led to the development of theories such as the theory of general relativity, which explains the relationship between space, time, and gravity.

3. Are there more than three dimensions?

According to some theories, there could be more than three dimensions. In addition to the three dimensions of length, width, and height that we are familiar with, there could be additional spatial dimensions that are too small for us to perceive. These extra dimensions are a key component of string theory and other models attempting to unify the laws of physics.

4. Can we experience higher dimensions?

It is difficult for us to imagine or experience higher dimensions because our brains are limited to perceiving three dimensions. However, some scientists believe that through mathematical and scientific models, we can gain a better understanding of higher dimensions and their effects on our universe.

5. How does the concept of dimensions relate to parallel universes?

The concept of parallel universes, also known as the multiverse theory, suggests that there could be multiple universes existing simultaneously alongside our own. In this theory, each universe could have its own set of dimensions, which could be vastly different from ours. This idea is still highly debated and has not been scientifically proven.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
348
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
599
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
55
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
510
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
Back
Top