Can Random Word Generation Lead to Major Discoveries?

  • Thread starter Thread starter waht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of using a super fast computer to randomly generate words and phrases, with the hope of eventually producing meaningful texts, such as Shakespeare's works or even groundbreaking scientific discoveries like a cure for cancer. However, it is argued that simply generating random strings of text does not inherently provide meaning or value. The likelihood of producing coherent and useful information through random generation is extremely low, as the process would yield countless nonsensical combinations alongside any potentially meaningful phrases. The complexity of concepts like the theory of everything and the intricacies of scientific research necessitate structured inquiry and experimentation, rather than relying on chance. Thus, while the idea is intriguing, it is deemed impractical and inefficient compared to traditional methods of research and technological advancement.
waht
Messages
1,499
Reaction score
4
Assuming that the theory of everything could be described in words, a super fast computer could generate random letters and words. Somewhere along the line, the works of shakespear would emerge. If we kept going and going, a lot of documents and books would emerge and even new ideas or discoveries or cure for cancer.

has anyone attempted doing this, or is it even possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK so, after a few eons of churning out random words, we come across the string:
'The cure for cancer is aaaa'

then, later it churns out the string:
'The cure for cancer is bghbfu'

then, eons later it churns out:
'The cure for cancer is rectangle'
then:
'The cure for cancer is penicillin'
then:
'The cure for cancer is quietly'

You see, churning out random phrases does not provide any meaning.

Say you get a sequence that says 'The cure for cancer is molybdenum'. Is that the cure for cancer? Who knows? The program also, eons before, churned out 'The cure for cancer is qolybdenum'. In fact, it's churned out every other possible combination of ten-letters as well. How are you any farther ahead?
 


While it is an interesting idea to use a super fast computer to generate random words and potentially stumble upon the works of Shakespeare and even new ideas or discoveries, it is not a feasible method for obtaining such things. The theory of everything is a complex concept that cannot be fully described in just words, and it requires extensive research and experimentation to understand and discover. Additionally, the likelihood of randomly generating Shakespeare's works or a cure for cancer is incredibly low and would require an immense amount of time and resources. Instead, advancements in technology and scientific research should be utilized to make progress in these areas.
 
https://www.newsweek.com/robert-redford-dead-hollywood-live-updates-2130559 Apparently Redford was a somewhat poor student, so was headed to Europe to study art and painting, but stopped in New York and studied acting. Notable movies include Barefoot in the Park (1967 with Jane Fonda), Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969, with Paul Newma), Jeremiah Johnson, the political drama The Candidate (both 1972), The Sting (1973 with Paul Newman), the romantic dramas The Way We Were (1973), and...
Back
Top