Combining Angular Momentum: A Comparison of Two Equations

  • Thread starter apunisheriii
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of angular momentum for an electron in a permitted orbit. The formula L=mrw is incorrect and should be L=mrv or L=mr^2w. The speed of the electron can be found using the equation mv^2/r = k e^2/r^2 and is approximately 7.29x105m/s, which is used to check the angular momentum condition. However, this approach is a bit circular and the important thing is to question and understand the explanations.
  • #1
apunisheriii
can these be combined??

Homework Statement


why does the angular momentum,L of a electron in allowed orbit (for instance,n=3) is different when i used L=mrw
and L=nh/2pi??I'hv assumed tat the electron as non-relastivistic..

Homework Equations


i let speed of electron =70x105m/s and rn=ao9
*mass of electron,me=9.1x10-31kg

The Attempt at a Solution


K=1/2mev2-(1)
K=mer2w2-(2)

(1)=(2)
1/2mev2=1/2mer2w2
v=rw
v=rnw where the rnis the radius of permissible orbit in atom
v=ao9x w
w=1.47x1016

then,i started to find L (not 'light"in death note of course ^^)
L=mrw
=m(9ao)w
=6.37x10-24J s

but when i used L=nh/2pi the answer is 3.17x10-34J s

is the angular velocity couldn't use in this respect or the different is negligible??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Hi apunisheriii,

apunisheriii said:

Homework Statement


why does the angular momentum,L of a electron in allowed orbit (for instance,n=3) is different when i used L=mrw

This formula is not correct; for a particle, the angular momentum can be written as [itex]L=mrv= mr^2\omega[/itex], where [itex]v\perp r[/itex].

and L=nh/2pi??I'hv assumed tat the electron as non-relastivistic..


Homework Equations


i let speed of electron =70x105m/s

How did you find this speed? It does not look right to me.
 
  • #3


oppss

din realize for tat mistake...haha thnx
with the equation L=mr2w
i get 3.03x10-33kg m s-1
which is much closer to the answer of the equation L=nh/2 pi

the speed of electron is just my assumption
is it wrong??becoz I am just trying to find w in order to find L
So,is it unsuitable for using such speed?
 
  • #4


apunisheriii said:
oppss

din realize for tat mistake...haha thnx
with the equation L=mr2w
i get 3.03x10-33kg m s-1
which is much closer to the answer of the equation L=nh/2 pi

the speed of electron is just my assumption
is it wrong??becoz I am just trying to find w in order to find L
So,is it unsuitable for using such speed?

In the bohr atom, the speed of the electron will depend on the radius. So when you specify the radius (and the charges and masses), there is only one speed that works. The important thing is that the orbits are circular; so how can you relate the speed and radius?
 
  • #5


alphysicist said:
In the bohr atom, the speed of the electron will depend on the radius. So when you specify the radius (and the charges and masses), there is only one speed that works. The important thing is that the orbits are circular; so how can you relate the speed and radius?

o,
So i should find the speed by using mv2/r=e2/4 pi epsilonor2

then v=7.29x105m/s
is it alright now?
 
  • #6


apunisheriii said:
o,
So i should find the speed by using mv2/r=e2/4 pi epsilonor2

then v=7.29x105m/s
is it alright now?

That approach looks right to me; go ahead and check it: plug it into your expression

[tex]
m r v = \frac{n h }{2\pi}
[/tex]

and see if both sides are equal.
 
  • #7


yes,mostly the same. thnx
i think I am doing something stupid...haha
just like using informations to find same informations...
 
  • #8


apunisheriii said:
yes,mostly the same. thnx
i think I am doing something stupid...haha
just like using informations to find same informations...

It is a bit circular, because the angular momentum quantization condition [itex]mvr=nh/(2\pi)[/itex] and centripetal acceleration condition [itex]mv^2/r = k e^2/r^2[/itex] are used to find the bohr radius, which you used to check the angular momentum condition. But the important thing is that you noticed something that looked wrong and decided to find out what the explanation was. That's not stupid; that's the way to understanding.
 

1. Can different chemical compounds be combined?

Yes, different chemical compounds can be combined to form new compounds through chemical reactions.

2. Can elements from the periodic table be combined?

Yes, elements from the periodic table can be combined to form new compounds through chemical bonding.

3. Can different types of energy be combined?

Yes, different types of energy can be combined through the process of energy conversion, such as converting chemical energy to thermal energy.

4. Can different scientific theories be combined?

Yes, different scientific theories can be combined to form a more comprehensive explanation or model of a phenomenon.

5. Can different scientific methods be combined?

Yes, different scientific methods can be combined to provide a more complete understanding of a research question or problem.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
900
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
894
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
902
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
854
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top